Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias01:18

Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias

Bradyarrhythmias are cardiac rhythm disorders characterized by a slower-than-normal heart rate, typically defined as fewer than 60 beats per minute. Some of which are discussed here:Sinus BradycardiaSinus bradycardia presents a heart rate lower than 60 beats per minute, with a regular rhythm originating from the SA node. The ECG typically shows normal P waves preceding each QRS complex, a normal PR interval (0.12 to 0.20 seconds), and a normal QRS duration (0.06 to 0.10 seconds).First-Degree AV...
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers01:22

Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers

β-adrenergic antagonists, commonly known as β-blockers, block the effects of sympathetic neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline (NA) and adrenaline (ADR). They have several beneficial effects in heart failure treatment. They reduce heart rate, the force of contraction, and cardiac muscle relaxation. They also slow the atrial-ventricular conduction rate and raise the threshold for arrhythmias. The concentration of β-blockers determines their effects on bronchodilation, vasodilation, and...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias01:25

Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

Dysrhythmia management involves a multifaceted approach, incorporating pharmacological treatments, medical procedures, surgical interventions, lifestyle modifications, and patient education.Pharmacological ManagementAntiarrhythmic Drugs:Class I (Sodium Channel Blockers): This class includes quinidine and procainamide, which reduce the speed of impulse conduction in the heart, stabilize the cardiac membrane, and control arrhythmias. Quinidine and procainamide are Class IA agents that prolong the...
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management01:25

Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is characterized by retrograde blood circulation from the left ventricle into the left atrium due to inadequate mitral valve closure. The severity of the condition, symptoms, and underlying cause determine treatment strategies.Monitoring and Pharmacological TreatmentPatients with mild to moderate MR typically do not need immediate intervention but regular monitoring to assess progression and guide treatment. Patients with mild MR should have an echocardiogram every 3-5...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers01:24

Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

Adrenergic stimulation generally impacts cardiac rate and rhythm. Specifically, stimulation of the β-adrenoceptors triggers an increase in intracellular calcium ion influx and pacemaker currents, which may cause arrhythmias. Catecholamines like adrenaline also demonstrate β2-adrenoceptor-mediated hypokalemia, impacting cardiac action potential and disrupting the normal cardiac rhythm. Class II antiarrhythmic drugs are β-adrenoceptor antagonists or β-blockers, which indirectly block calcium...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm01:29

Disturbances in Heart Rhythm

Arrhythmia or dysrhythmia refers to an abnormal heart rhythm caused by a defect in the heart's conduction system. It can cause the heart to beat irregularly, too quickly, or too slowly, leading to symptoms like chest pain, shortness of breath, and fainting. Factors such as stress, caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, certain drugs, congenital defects, diseases, and electrolyte abnormalities can trigger arrhythmias.
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Heart Failure Duration, Cardiac Remodeling, Dysfunction, and Hemodynamic Severity in HFpEF and HFmrEF: Insights From REDUCE LAP-HF II.

JACC. Heart failure·2026
Same author

Safety and Feasibility of IVC Flow Modulation With the Doraya in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

JACC. Heart failure·2026
Same author

Apixaban versus warfarin for anticoagulation after left ventricular assist device implantation: A multicenter real-world analysis.

JHLT open·2026
Same author

The present and the future of risk stratification for and prevention of sudden cardiac death: A Heart Rhythm Society think tank meeting.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Fluid Management of Acute Heart Failure With the Reprieve System: The Randomized Controlled FASTR Trial.

JACC. Heart failure·2026
Same author

Direct-to-Participant Enrollment in a Virtual Trial: Lessons Learned From the Heartline Study.

JACC. Advances·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
12:45

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing

Published on: December 11, 2017

Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.

Anne B Curtis1, Seth J Worley, Philip B Adamson

  • 1Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo General Medical Center, 100 High St., D2-76, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA. abcurtis@buffalo.edu

The New England Journal of Medicine
|April 26, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Biventricular pacing significantly reduced mortality and heart failure events in patients with atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction compared to standard right ventricular pacing.

More Related Videos

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
10:17

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System

Published on: April 11, 2025

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
08:05

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice

Published on: June 29, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
12:45

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing

Published on: December 11, 2017

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
10:17

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System

Published on: April 11, 2025

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
08:05

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice

Published on: June 29, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Heart Failure Management

Background:

  • Right ventricular apical pacing can lead to left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
  • Biventricular pacing is an alternative strategy for patients with atrioventricular block.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if biventricular pacing reduces mortality, morbidity, and adverse left ventricular remodeling.
  • To compare biventricular pacing with standard right ventricular pacing in specific patient populations.

Main Methods:

  • Patients with atrioventricular block, NYHA class I-III heart failure, and LVEF ≤50% were enrolled.
  • Participants were randomized to receive either standard right ventricular pacing or biventricular pacing via a cardiac-resynchronization device.
  • The primary outcome measured was time to death, urgent heart failure visit, or significant increase in left ventricular end-systolic volume index.

Main Results:

  • Biventricular pacing resulted in a significantly lower incidence of the primary outcome compared to right ventricular pacing (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.90).
  • The primary outcome occurred in 45.8% of patients with biventricular pacing versus 55.6% with right ventricular pacing.
  • Left ventricular lead complications were reported in 6.4% of patients.

Conclusions:

  • Biventricular pacing demonstrates superiority over conventional right ventricular pacing.
  • This approach is beneficial for patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (NYHA class I-III).