Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

08:03
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
3D facial morphometry in children with oral clefts
Summary
Three-dimensional facial morphology differs significantly in children with cleft lip and palate compared to controls. Differences were most pronounced when both lip and palate were affected, with isolated cleft palate showing the least variation.
Area of Science:
- Craniofacial morphology
- Pediatric plastic surgery
- 3D imaging analysis
Background:
- Cleft lip and palate (CLP) significantly impacts facial development.
- Understanding 3D facial morphology in children with CLP is crucial for treatment planning and outcomes.
- Previous studies often relied on 2D analysis, limiting detailed morphological characterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize three-dimensional (3D) facial morphological variation in children with various types of cleft lip and palate (CLP).
- To compare the 3D facial morphology of CLP groups with an age- and sex-matched control group.
- To identify specific patterns of facial variation associated with different CLP subtypes.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional, case-controlled observational morphometric study.
- 3D stereophotogrammetry was used to scan 103 children (aged 8-12) with CLP and 80 controls.
- Thirty-nine facial landmarks were digitized to compute linear and angular measurements, analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant differences (P < .05) in 3D facial morphometry were observed between all CLP groups and controls.
- The most substantial morphometric differences were found in groups with combined lip and palate involvement.
- Children with isolated cleft palate (ICP) exhibited facial morphology most similar to the control group.
Conclusions:
- Significant 3D soft-tissue facial differences exist in children with CLP compared to controls.
- These differences are most prominent in the nasolabial region, particularly in groups with lip involvement.
- Isolated cleft palate demonstrates less significant facial morphological deviation from controls.

