Mimics and chameleons in motor neurone disease

Martin R Turner1, Kevin Talbot

  • 1University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford, UK. martin.turner@ndcn.ox.ac.uk

Practical Neurology
|April 26, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Motor neurone disease (MND) diagnosis requires careful clinical assessment, as mimics are rare but can cause delays. Recognizing key motor and non-motor signs aids accurate and timely diagnosis for better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neuroscience

Background:

  • Motor neurone disease (MND) progression is irreversible, necessitating accurate diagnosis to avoid delays.
  • The absence of a definitive diagnostic test for MND increases the risk of misdiagnosis.
  • Neurologists face challenges due to MND's heterogeneous presentations and potential mimic disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight key clinical signs with high predictive value for MND.
  • To discuss the diagnostic challenges and potential mimics of MND.
  • To emphasize the importance of clinical assessment in timely MND diagnosis and care planning.

Main Methods:

  • Clinical review of motor neurone disease presentations.
  • Analysis of diagnostic signs and their predictive value.
  • Discussion of differential diagnoses and diagnostic pitfalls.

Main Results:

  • Specific signs like fasciculations, tongue wasting, and 'split hand' indicate MND.
  • Cognitive, behavioral, and emotional changes can also be present.
  • Despite heterogeneity, distinct clinical features aid diagnosis in most cases.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate clinical evaluation is paramount for diagnosing motor neurone disease.
  • Prompt diagnosis of MND is crucial for effective patient care and quality of life.
  • Distinguishing MND from rare mimics requires a combination of specific clinical signs and careful assessment.