Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

An Orthotopic Resectional Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer
Published on: September 24, 2020
Therapeutic advances in pancreatic cancer
Andrew Scott Paulson1, Hop S Tran Cao, Margaret A Tempero
1University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.
Abstract:
Despite our improved understanding of pancreatic cancer biology and ability to perform more complex pancreatic cancer surgeries that produce better short-term outcomes, major progress toward increasing survival times has been painstakingly slow. Through the often-repeated, dismal survival statistics, it is easy to lose sight of real progress that has been made in pancreatic cancer therapy. It is particularly interesting to observe the extent to which these advances are interdependent and the effects they have had on practice. For example, during the past 5-10 years, we have seen widespread adoption of pancreatic imaging protocols that allow for objectively defined criteria of resectability. This has led to the definition of "borderline resectable pancreatic cancer"--a new clinical category that has affected the design of clinical trials. A major change in our surgical approach has been the move to minimally invasive pancreatectomy, which continues to gain broader acceptance and use, particularly for left-sided lesions. Although many new agents have been developed aimed at putative molecular targets, recent breakthroughs in therapy for advanced disease have arisen from our ability to safely give patients combination cytotoxic chemotherapy. We are now faced with the challenge of combining multidrug, cytotoxic chemotherapies with newer-generation agents. Ultimately, the hope is that drug combinations will be selected based on biomarkers, and strategies for pancreatic cancer therapy will be personalized, which could prolong patients' lives and reduce toxicity. We review the major advances in pancreatic cancer therapy during the last 5 years, and discuss how these have set the stage for greater progress in the near future.
Insights
Recent advances in pancreatic cancer therapy include improved imaging, minimally invasive surgery, and combination chemotherapy. Personalized treatment strategies hold promise for improving patient survival and reducing toxicity.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Medical Oncology
Background:
- Pancreatic cancer survival rates remain low despite advances in surgical techniques and understanding of cancer biology.
- Progress in pancreatic cancer therapy has been incremental, with significant improvements in survival times yet to be realized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review major advances in pancreatic cancer therapy over the last 5 years.
- To discuss the impact of these advances on clinical practice and future research directions.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on pancreatic cancer imaging, surgical techniques, and chemotherapeutic strategies.
- Analysis of the interdependence of therapeutic advances and their effect on clinical trial design and patient management.
Main Results:
- Widespread adoption of advanced imaging protocols has led to the definition of "borderline resectable pancreatic cancer."
- Minimally invasive pancreatectomy is increasingly accepted, especially for left-sided pancreatic tumors.
- Combination cytotoxic chemotherapy has shown breakthroughs in treating advanced pancreatic cancer.
Conclusions:
- Current therapeutic advances, including improved diagnostics and multimodal treatments, are setting the stage for future progress.
- Personalized treatment strategies, guided by biomarkers and combining chemotherapy with novel agents, are crucial for improving outcomes.
- Future research should focus on integrating multidrug chemotherapies with newer agents and biomarker-driven approaches to prolong survival and minimize toxicity in pancreatic cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

