Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Cost-effectiveness of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation in the ATHENA trial
Jenny Berg1, Luc Sauriol, Stuart Connolly
1OptumInsight, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.
Insights
Dronedarone is a cost-effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter, reducing hospitalizations and deaths. The study found it cost CAD $7560 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, which is within acceptable healthcare thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- The ATHENA trial assessed dronedarone versus placebo in 4628 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter.
- Patients were aged ≥70 with risk factors or ≥75 without risk factors, receiving standard therapy plus dronedarone or placebo.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dronedarone from a Canadian healthcare perspective.
- Analysis based on resource utilization and cardiovascular events (hospitalization or death) from the ATHENA trial.
Main Methods:
- Aggregated medical resource utilization data (hospitalizations, adverse events, outpatient visits, medications) for all patients over a mean of 21 months.
- Calculated avoided cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause deaths.
- Projected survival and quality-adjusted survival using life tables, with costs and effects discounted at 5% annually.
Main Results:
- Dronedarone patients incurred higher mean total costs (CAD $7402) versus placebo (CAD $6708).
- Dronedarone costs were partially offset by savings in cardiovascular hospitalizations and medications.
- Patients on dronedarone experienced 0.18 fewer events (hospitalizations or death), with a cost per quality-adjusted life-year of CAD $7560.
Conclusions:
- Treatment with dronedarone, as studied in ATHENA, is cost-effective.
- The cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained falls within generally accepted healthcare thresholds.
Background:
The ATHENA trial randomized 4628 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter, aged ≥ 70 years with risk factors or ≥ 75 years without risk factors, to receive 400 mg dronedarone twice daily or placebo in addition to standard therapy. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dronedarone from a Canadian health care perspective based on resource utilization and cardiovascular hospitalization or death in ATHENA.
Methods:
Data on medical resource utilization (cardiovascular hospitalizations, hospitalization because of treatment-related adverse events, outpatient examinations and procedures, study drug and concomitant medications) were aggregated for all randomized patients during the entire trial period (mean 21 months). Effectiveness was measured using the total number of avoided cardiovascular hospitalizations and deaths from any cause, and projected survival and quality-adjusted survival using life tables adjusted for AF mortality and data on determinants of utility in AF. We used standard unit costs from Canada (2008), discounting costs and effects at 5% per year.
Results:
Patients receiving dronedarone incurred a mean total cost (undiscounted) of CAD $7402 during the trial period, compared with CAD $6708 for patients receiving placebo. The cost of dronedarone was partly offset by savings for cardiovascular hospitalizations and concomitant medications. On average, patients taking dronedarone experienced 0.18 fewer events (cardiovascular hospitalizations or death). The cost per event avoided was CAD $3807, the cost per life-year gained was CAD $5204, and the cost per quality-adjusted life-years was CAD $7560.
Conclusions:
Compared with generally accepted thresholds, our results indicate that treatment with dronedarone as in ATHENA is cost-effective.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...

