Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction (PPI) Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
Increased Alzheimer's disease neuropathology is associated with type 2 diabetes and ApoE ε.4 carrier status
Michael Malek-Ahmadi1, Thomas Beach, Aleksandra Obradov
1The Cleo Robert Center for Clinical Research, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ 85351, USA.
Background:
Past studies investigating the association between Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) have provided conflicting results. While several studies indicate that subjects with comorbid AD and DM2 have less AD pathology, others have found no significant differences in AD pathology between the two groups. Other studies have indicated that individuals with AD and DM2 have significantly greater neuropathology than AD individuals who do not have DM2. Additional research has demonstrated that ApoE ε4 carriers with AD and DM2 have significantly greater pathology than ApoE ε4 non-carriers.
Methods:
Data on clinically and pathologically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease cases (NINDS-ADRDA clinically and NIA Reagan intermediate or high pathologically) with DM2 (n= 40) and those without DM2 (n= 322) from the Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program were obtained for this study. Plaque and tangle scores from the frontal, parietal, temporal, entorhinal and hippocampal regions were compared between the DM2+ and DM2 - groups. In addition, total plaque count, total tangle count, and Braak scores were also compared between groups. Similar analyses were conducted to determine the effect of ApoE ε4 carrier status on the neuropathological variables while also accounting for and DM2 status.
Results:
The DM2+ and DM2 - groups showed no significant differences on plaque and tangle pathology. Logistic regression analyses, which accounted for the effects of ApoE .ε4 carrier status and age at death, found no association between total plaque [OR 1.05 (0.87, 1.27), p = 0.60] or total tangle [OR 0.97 (0.89, 1.07) p = 0.58] counts and DM2 status. ApoE ε4 carrier status was not significantly associated with DM2 status [.Χ2 = 0.30 (df = 1), p = 0.58]. Within the DM2+ group, significantly greater plaque and tangle pathology was found for ApoE ε4 carriers in relation to DM2+ ApoE ε4 non-carriers.
Conclusion:
Overall, the presence of DM2 does not affect plaque and tangle burden in a sample of clinically and pathologically confirmed AD cases. Among AD individuals with DM2, those who are ApoE ε4 carriers had significantly greater neuropathology than those who do not carry an ApoE ε4 allele. Positive DM2 status appears to exacerbate AD neuropathology in the presence of ApoE ε4.
Insights
Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) does not alter Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology overall. However, in AD patients with DM2, ApoE ε4 carriers show significantly greater neuropathology, suggesting DM2 exacerbates AD in the presence of ApoE ε4.
Area of Science:
- Neuropathology
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Metabolic Disorders
Background:
- Conflicting evidence exists regarding the association between Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2).
- Some studies suggest comorbid DM2 reduces AD pathology, while others find no difference or increased neuropathology.
- ApoE ε4 carriers with comorbid AD and DM2 may exhibit greater pathology than non-carriers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of DM2 on Alzheimer's disease (AD) neuropathology.
- To determine if DM2 status influences plaque and tangle burden in AD cases.
- To examine the combined effect of DM2 and ApoE ε4 carrier status on AD neuropathology.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of clinically and pathologically confirmed AD cases with (n=40) and without (n=322) DM2 from the Banner Sun Health Research Institute Brain and Body Donation Program.
- Comparison of plaque and tangle scores across brain regions, total plaque/tangle counts, and Braak scores between DM2+ and DM2- groups.
- Logistic regression analyses to assess the independent and combined effects of DM2 and ApoE ε4 carrier status on neuropathological variables, controlling for age at death.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in overall plaque and tangle pathology were observed between the DM2+ and DM2- groups.
- Logistic regression revealed no association between DM2 status and total plaque or tangle counts, after accounting for ApoE ε4 carrier status and age at death.
- Within the DM2+ group, ApoE ε4 carriers exhibited significantly greater plaque and tangle pathology compared to DM2+ non-carriers.
Conclusions:
- The presence of DM2 does not significantly alter the overall burden of plaque and tangle pathology in Alzheimer's disease cases.
- ApoE ε4 carrier status significantly exacerbates AD neuropathology in individuals with comorbid DM2.
- These findings highlight a potential interaction between DM2, ApoE ε4, and AD neuropathological progression.
More Related Videos
06:21Osmotic Minipump Implantation for Increasing Glucose Concentration in Mouse Cerebrospinal Fluid
Published on: April 7, 2023
09:45Motor and Hippocampal Dependent Spatial Learning and Reference Memory Assessment in a Transgenic Rat Model of Alzheimer's Disease with Stroke
Published on: March 22, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer Disease l: Introduction
Alzheimer Disease ll: Pathophysiology
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ and tau...
Psychoneuroimmunology: Diabetes and Cancer
Dementia l: Introduction
Diabetic Neuropathy