Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares the...

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...

Variability: Analysis

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Guest editors' note on special issue on application of estimand.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2023

Same author

Estimand in benefit-risk assessment.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2023

Same author

Design of paediatric trials with benefit-risk endpoints using a composite score of adverse events of interest (AEI) and win-statistics.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2022

Same author

The win odds: statistical inference and regression.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2022

Same author

Win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit) can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2022

Same author

A note regarding the special issue on <i></i> and opportunities for future research.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Nonparametric multivariate inference on shift parameters.

John E Kolassa¹, Yodit Seifu

¹Department of Statistics and Biostatistics, 504 Hill Center, Busch Campus, 110 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. kolassa@stat.rutgers.edu

Academic Radiology

|May 1, 2013

Summary

This study introduces a new nonparametric method to estimate differences in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between early and advanced prostate cancer, adjusting for Gleason score. The method, based on adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), offers a novel approach for prognostic analysis.

More Related Videos

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Medical Informatics
Prognostic Modeling

Background:

Accurate differentiation between early and advanced prostate cancer is crucial for effective treatment.
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score are key indicators, but their combined prognostic value requires robust statistical methods.
Existing methods may not adequately adjust for stratification factors like hospital or covariates like Gleason score.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and present a nonparametric method for estimating the shift in median PSA levels between early and advanced prostate cancer groups.
To adjust for the influence of Gleason score as a covariate and stratify by hospital.
To extend the methodology for multivariate manifest variables.

Main Methods:

Utilizes estimating equations derived from a rank-based estimator of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
The AUC estimator is adjusted for stratification and covariates.
A family of tests is constructed by shifting manifest variables, with the confidence region determined by non-rejection of the null hypothesis (AUC = 0.5).

Main Results:

Simulated data demonstrated performance consistent with theoretical approximations.
Applied to prostate cancer, the method estimated the mean difference in PSA levels between advanced and non-advanced cases, controlling for Gleason score.
Demonstrated utility in a breast cancer recurrence example, estimating prognostic factors like age and tumor size while adjusting for treatment and grade.

Conclusions:

The proposed methodology offers a nonparametric approach for estimating adjusted AUC.
This statistic can be used to quantify the shift between two manifest variables, providing valuable prognostic insights.
The method is versatile and applicable to various clinical scenarios requiring adjusted prognostic factor analysis.