Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...

Prediction Intervals

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
The...

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Development of an Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry Method for Multiclass Phytohormone Quantification Via Multifunctional Chemical Derivatization.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2026

Same author

Baby Boomers in Germany: a secondary data analysis of demographics, regional disparities, healthcare utilization, and mortality.

BMC public health·2026

Same author

Genetic architecture and functional consequences of lateral root length in maize (Zea mays L.).

Journal of experimental botany·2026

Same author

Native alleles at lhcb6 shape photosynthetic efficiency and early growth in maize.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Predicting enviromically adapted varieties with big data.

Genome biology·2026

Same author

Comparison of approximation methods for genomic estimated breeding values from observed to liability scales in dairy cattle health traits.

Journal of dairy science·2025

Same journal

Balanced mediated pathway detection in genomic data.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2026

Same journal

Annealed variational mixtures for disease subtyping and biomarker discovery.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2026

Same journal

Performance of the permutation test approach with base calling errors for detecting changes in variant allele frequencies in ctDNA for a single patient.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2026

Same journal

BLOG: Bayesian longitudinal omics with group constraints.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2026

Same journal

AI-driven risk prediction and categorization in cystic fibrosis leveraging AttentiveLSTM and Fox Wolf Optimizer.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2026

Same journal

Perfect collinearity not created equal: measuring and visualizing the severity of multi-collinearity of modern omics data.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.

Christina Lehermeier¹, Valentin Wimmer, Theresa Albrecht

¹Plant Breeding, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Straße 4, 85354 Freising, Germany.

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology

|May 1, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian genomic prediction models show varying sensitivity to hyperparameter settings. BayesA and BayesB methods require careful tuning for optimal prediction accuracy in plant and animal breeding.

More Related Videos

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABA_A Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABAA Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Identification and Classification of Position-specific GABA_A Receptor Subunit Missense Variants for Their Role In Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons

Published on: June 6, 2025

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

Area of Science:

Quantitative genetics
Genomic prediction
Statistical modeling

Background:

Genome-based prediction of breeding values is crucial in plant and animal breeding.
Statistical models are used to maximize prediction accuracy.
Sensitivity of these models to prior and hyperparameter specification is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

Investigate the sensitivity of Bayesian prediction methods to prior and hyperparameter specification.
Compare prediction performance of Bayesian Ridge, Bayesian Lasso, BayesA, and BayesB.
Assess the impact of hyperparameter settings on predictive ability.

Main Methods:

Utilized Bayesian prediction methods with a linear regression model.
Compared different hyperparameter settings for four Bayesian methods.
Employed simulated maize datasets and an experimental maize dataset (698 lines, 56110 SNPs).
Assessed predictive ability using five-fold cross-validation.
Quantified Bayesian learning using Hellinger distance.

Main Results:

All four methods achieved similar predictive abilities.
BayesA and BayesB showed higher sensitivity to hyperparameter settings compared to Bayesian Ridge and Bayesian Lasso.
Non-optimal hyperparameter choices substantially impacted BayesA and BayesB prediction performance.

Conclusions:

Hyperparameter specification significantly affects prediction performance in BayesA and BayesB.
Careful selection of hyperparameters is essential for optimizing genomic prediction accuracy with BayesA and BayesB.
Understanding model sensitivity aids in selecting appropriate Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.