Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Amy Franklin1, Anastasia Giannakidou, Susan Goldin-Meadow
1University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Cognitive Informatics and Decision Making, Houston, Texas, United States. Amy.Franklin@uth.tmc.edu
Abstract:
Deaf children whose hearing losses are so severe that they cannot acquire spoken language, and whose hearing parents have not exposed them to sign language, use gestures called homesigns to communicate. Homesigns have been shown to contain many of the properties of natural languages. Here we ask whether homesign has structure building devices for negation and questions. We identify two meanings (negation, question) that correspond semantically to propositional functions, that is, to functions that apply to a sentence (whose semantic value is a proposition, ϕ) and yield another proposition that is more complex (¬ϕ for negation; ?ϕ for question). Combining ϕ with ¬ or ? thus involves sentence modification. We propose that these negative and question functions are structure building operators, and we support this claim with data from an American homesigner. We show that: (a) each meaning is marked by a particular form in the child's gesture system (side-to-side headshake for negation, manual flip for question); (b) the two markers occupy systematic, and different, positions at the periphery of the gesture sentences (headshake at the beginning, flip at the end); and (c) the flip is extended from questions to other uses associated with the wh-form (exclamatives, referential expressions of location) and thus functions like a category in natural languages. If what we see in homesign is a language creation process (Goldin-Meadow, 2003), and if negation and question formation involve sentential modification, then our analysis implies that homesign has at least this minimal sentential syntax. Our findings thus contribute to ongoing debates about properties that are fundamental to language and language learning.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to the Sign Test
Components of Language
Sign Test for Nominal Data
For example, consider a...
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can cause...
Indeterminate Structure
Schemas
