Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Helicopter transport effectiveness of patients for primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Miranda Phillips1, Annette O Arthur, Raj Chandwaney
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.
Insights
Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) for ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients did not show a direct time savings compared to ground emergency medical services (EMS). However, HEMS transports may save approximately 1.2 lives per 100 flights by reducing mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Time to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is critical for myocardial salvage in ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) plays a role in regionalized cardiac care.
- Interfacility transport logistics for STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI require evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the logistics of HEMS and ground emergency medical services (EMS) for interfacility transport of STEMI patients.
- To determine the effectiveness of HEMS in terms of lives saved per 100 flights.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of interfacility transports of STEMI patients for primary PCI.
- Study period: 18 months (January 2010 - June 2011).
- Comparison of pretransport handling times, door-to-PCI times, and transport distances between HEMS and ground EMS.
Main Results:
- 66% of reviewed STEMI patients were transported by HEMS.
- Pretransport handling times were similar for HEMS and ground EMS.
- Ground EMS achieved faster door-to-PCI times (<90 minutes) more frequently than HEMS.
- HEMS patients traveled significantly farther distances.
- Estimated median time savings for HEMS transports: 41 minutes.
- 78.8% of HEMS flights saved over 30 minutes.
Conclusions:
- Direct time savings were not demonstrated for HEMS versus ground EMS.
- Analysis of estimated ground EMS times for HEMS patients suggests a median time savings of 41 minutes.
- HEMS demonstrated a time-based mortality effectiveness of approximately 1.2 lives saved per 100 flights.
Background:
For patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), time to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important factor in saving myocardium. Helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) has become a vital component in regionalized cardiac care. The objective of this study is to assess the logistics of HEMS and ground EMS for interfacility transport of STEMI patients for primary PCI and to determine the effectiveness of HEMS transports in terms of the number of lives saved per 100 flights.
Methods:
This is a retrospective database and records review of interfacility transports of STEMI patients for primary PCI to a single medical center. The study period consisted of 18 months (January 2010 through June 2011).
Results:
Ninety-seven of 120 patients met the criteria for review. Of these, 66% were transported by HEMS. The pretransport patient handling times were similar for the HEMS and ground EMS groups. Door-to-PCI in < 120 minutes was achieved in 35.5% (11 of 31) of ground EMS and 24.2% (16 of 66) of HEMS. Patients transported by ground EMS were more likely to get to PCI in < 90 minutes (9.7%, 3 of 31). HEMS patients traveled significantly farther distances, 51 miles (IQR 43-68) than ground EMS, 37 miles (IQR 18-51). This equates to a 38% longer distance for patients transported by HEMS. An estimate of the driving time for HEMS-transported patients suggests HEMS transports saved a median of 41 minutes (IQR 33-48). The proportion of HEMS flights saving more than 30 minutes was 78.8% (95% CI 67.0-87.9%).
Conclusion:
The results did not show a time savings for HEMS- versus ground EMS-transported patients. When estimates of time spent for ground EMS of actual HEMS transported patients are analyzed, HEMS provides a median savings of 41 minutes, with a savings of at least 30 minutes in 78.8% of the HEMS patients. Based on estimates used in this study, conservative calculations arrived at a time-based mortality effectiveness of HEMS of about 1.2 lives saved per 100 flights.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
