Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

11:29
Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Siriwan Tangjitgamol1, Sumonmal Manusirivithaya, Malinee Laopaiboon
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. siriwanonco@yahoo.com.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|May 2, 2013
Summary
Interval debulking surgery (IDS) for advanced ovarian cancer shows no overall survival benefit. However, IDS may improve outcomes when primary surgery is less extensive or not performed by gynecologic oncologists.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Gynecologic Oncology
Background:
- Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (stages III-IV) often requires treatment when primary debulking surgery is not feasible.
- Interval debulking surgery (IDS) is an option following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for these patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of interval debulking surgery (IDS) in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
- To compare survival outcomes between IDS and conventional treatment (primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy).
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted.
- Searches included Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE up to June 2012.
- Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using random-effects models.
Main Results:
- Three RCTs involving 853 women were included. No significant difference in OS or PFS was found between IDS and chemotherapy alone.
- Subgroup analysis indicated a survival benefit for IDS in patients whose primary surgery was less extensive or not performed by gynecologic oncologists.
- Chemotherapy toxicity rates were similar; data on other adverse events and quality of life were limited.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence does not conclusively support or refute the use of IDS to improve survival in advanced ovarian cancer compared to conventional treatment.
- IDS may offer benefits in specific patient subgroups with less optimal primary surgical outcomes.
- Further research is needed on quality of life and adverse events associated with IDS.

