Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bone Remodeling

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.

Fractures: Bone Repair

Fractures: Bone Repair

Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during bone...

Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification

Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification

Bone formation, or ossification, begins around the sixth to seventh week of embryonic development. Most bones develop from a cartilaginous template through the process of endochondral ossification. Cartilage formation begins when clusters of mesenchymal cells differentiate into chondrocytes. These chondrocytes proliferate rapidly and secrete an extracellular matrix that becomes encased in a membrane called the perichondrium. The resulting cartilage model provides a template that resembles the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Chitosan-carboxymethyl tara gum polyelectrolyte complex matrix tablets for sustained gastrointestinal drug dissolution using paracetamol as a model drug.

Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences·2026

Same author

Percutaneous Endoscopic Pharyngostomy (PEP) Tube Placement for Gastrointestinal Diversion: A PEP in Your Palliative Step.

The American surgeon·2026

Same author

Autonomous Uncertainty Quantification for Computational Point-of-Care Sensors.

ACS nano·2026

Same author

Why detailed modeling matters in the FE-based pre-clinical evaluation of temporomandibular joint implants.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026

Same author

Morphometric variations of human mandible in the Indian population: comparison between healthy and ankylosed temporomandibular joints.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026

Same author

Mutation-Driven Remodeling of the LRRK2 Kinase Free-Energy Landscape and Its Consequences for Conformational Transitions and Inhibitor Binding Affinity.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components.

Rajesh Ghosh¹, Kaushik Mukherjee, Sanjay Gupta

¹Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine

|May 3, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cementless acetabular components can cause bone loss due to stress shielding. Ceramic components showed similar bone remodeling to metal, suggesting they are a viable alternative for long-term fixation.

Keywords:

Pelvic bone acetabular component bone remodelling finite element analysis hip prosthesis

More Related Videos

Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing

Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing

Published on: September 4, 2016

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants

Published on: May 14, 2020

Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing

Potentiodynamic Corrosion Testing

Published on: September 4, 2016

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

Area of Science:

Biomaterials Engineering
Orthopedic Surgery
Computational Biomechanics

Background:

Stress shielding leading to bone resorption around cementless acetabular components is a concern for long-term implant fixation.
Understanding bone adaptation to different implant materials and interfacial conditions is crucial for improving outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate load transfer deviations and bone adaptation around cementless metallic and ceramic acetabular components using computational models.
To analyze the impact of implant-bone interfacial conditions on stress shielding and bone resorption.

Main Methods:

Utilized three-dimensional finite element models of intact and implanted pelvises.
Incorporated a bone remodeling algorithm and simulated musculoskeletal loading during normal walking.
Evaluated variations in implant-bone interfacial conditions (bonded vs. debonded).

Main Results:

Bonded interfaces resulted in higher strain shielding and significant bone resorption (20%-50% density reduction) within the acetabulum.
Debonded interfaces showed bone density increases (50%-60%) in specific areas and lower overall resorption (2%-15%).
Both metallic and ceramic components exhibited similar strain shielding and bone remodeling patterns.

Conclusions:

The implant-bone interface showed low micromotion (<100 µm) and appeared less prone to failure post-operatively and after remodeling.
Ceramic acetabular components are a viable alternative to metal components, demonstrating comparable performance in terms of bone adaptation.
Optimizing the implant-bone interface is critical for mitigating stress shielding and promoting favorable bone remodeling.