Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

09:27
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
The common premise for uncommon conclusions.
1Department of Philosophy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. t.coady@unimelb.edu.au
Journal of Medical Ethics
|May 3, 2013
Summary
The moral status of early fetuses and newborns is often wrongly equated. This paper argues this shared premise is flawed, leading to implausible conclusions on abortion and infanticide ethics.
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Moral Philosophy
- Applied Ethics
Background:
- Controversy surrounds infanticide (postnatal abortion) and abortion debates.
- A common premise unites supporters and opponents: the moral status of early fetuses and newborns is identical.
- This shared belief leads to opposing conclusions regarding the right to life.
Purpose of the Study:
- To challenge the widely accepted premise equating the moral status of early fetuses and newborns.
- To demonstrate the implausibility of conclusions drawn from this common premise regarding abortion and infanticide.
- To analyze the philosophical underpinnings of speciesism and its influence on these ethical debates.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical argumentation and conceptual analysis.
- Examination of the ethical arguments for and against infanticide and abortion.
- Critique of the concept of speciesism and its role in moral status determination.
Main Results:
- The premise that early fetuses and newborns possess identical moral status is fundamentally flawed.
- Conclusions drawn by both infanticidists and anti-abortionists from this premise are deeply implausible.
- The philosophical arguments, including those related to speciesism, do not support this common premise.
Conclusions:
- The ethical debate on abortion and infanticide requires a re-evaluation of the moral status of fetuses and newborns.
- Rejecting the common premise is crucial for developing more coherent and plausible ethical positions.
- A nuanced understanding of moral status, distinct from species membership, is necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Unusual Results
Unusual results are those that have a very low chance of occurring. Unusual results can be identified using probabilities and the range rule of thumb. In problems involving probability, unusual results can be observed in 2 instances – an unusually high number of successes or an unusually low number of successes.
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
