Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
Published on: November 15, 2013
Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva
1Department of Philosophy, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97273, Waco, TX 76798-7273, USA. francis_beckwith@baylor.edu
Abstract:
This article responds to Giubilini and Minerva's article 'After birth abortion: why should the baby live?' published in the Journal of Medical Ethics. They argue for the permissibility of 'after-birth abortion', based on two conjoined considerations: (1) the fetus or newborn, though a 'potential person', is not an actual person, because it is not mature enough to appreciate its own interests, and (2) because we allow parents to terminate the life of a fetus when it is diagnosed with a deformity or fatal illness because of the burden it will place on the child, parent, family or society we should also allow parents to do the same to their newborn, since it is no more a person than the fetus. The author critiques this case by pointing out (a) the metaphysical ambiguity of potential personhood and (b) why the appeal to burdens is irrelevant or unnecessary.
Related Concept Videos
Potential Energy
Chemical bonds that form attractive forces between atoms also contain potential energy, called chemical energy. When a chemical reaction...
Potential Energy
Potential Energy due to Gravitation
Consider a mass gravitationally bound to another object. For example, the Earth is gravitationally bound to the Sun’s gravitational field. The potential energy of...
Thermodynamic Potentials
Calculations of Electric Potential II
Consider a...
Potential-Energy Criterion for Equilibrium
