Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Nasal Wipes for Influenza A Virus Detection and Isolation from Swine
Published on: December 4, 2015
A perspective on multiple waves of influenza pandemics
Anna Mummert1, Howard Weiss, Li-Ping Long
1Department of Mathematics, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, United States of America.
Background:
A striking characteristic of the past four influenza pandemic outbreaks in the United States has been the multiple waves of infections. However, the mechanisms responsible for the multiple waves of influenza or other acute infectious diseases are uncertain. Understanding these mechanisms could provide knowledge for health authorities to develop and implement prevention and control strategies.
Materials And Methods:
We exhibit five distinct mechanisms, each of which can generate two waves of infections for an acute infectious disease. The first two mechanisms capture changes in virus transmissibility and behavioral changes. The third mechanism involves population heterogeneity (e.g., demography, geography), where each wave spreads through one sub-population. The fourth mechanism is virus mutation which causes delayed susceptibility of individuals. The fifth mechanism is waning immunity. Each mechanism is incorporated into separate mathematical models, and outbreaks are then simulated. We use the models to examine the effects of the initial number of infected individuals (e.g., border control at the beginning of the outbreak) and the timing of and amount of available vaccinations.
Results:
Four models, individually or in any combination, reproduce the two waves of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in the United States, both qualitatively and quantitatively. One model reproduces the two waves only qualitatively. All models indicate that significantly reducing or delaying the initial numbers of infected individuals would have little impact on the attack rate. Instead, this reduction or delay results in a single wave as opposed to two waves. Furthermore, four of these models also indicate that a vaccination program started earlier than October 2009 (when the H1N1 vaccine was initially distributed) could have eliminated the second wave of infection, while more vaccine available starting in October would not have eliminated the second wave.
Insights
Understanding the causes of multiple infectious disease waves is crucial for public health. Mathematical models reveal that early vaccination strategies can mitigate subsequent infection waves, unlike border controls alone.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Mathematical Biology
- Public Health
Background:
- Multiple infection waves characterize past US influenza pandemics.
- Mechanisms driving these waves remain unclear.
- Understanding wave dynamics is key for effective control strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify mechanisms generating multiple infection waves for acute diseases.
- To model the impact of interventions on wave patterns.
Main Methods:
- Five distinct mechanisms were modeled: transmissibility changes, behavioral shifts, population heterogeneity, virus mutation, and waning immunity.
- Mathematical models simulated disease outbreaks.
- Simulations assessed effects of initial infected numbers and vaccination timing/amount.
Main Results:
- Four models reproduced the 2009 H1N1 pandemic waves quantitatively.
- Reducing initial infections altered wave number but not overall attack rate.
- Early vaccination (pre-October 2009) could have prevented the second H1N1 wave.
Conclusions:
- Virus transmissibility, population structure, and immunity dynamics can explain multiple infection waves.
- Early vaccination is more effective than delayed vaccination or initial infection control for wave mitigation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Viral Recombination
Influenza
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence
Viral Mutations
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Vaccinations

