Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Reflection: medicines for children--science alone is not enough
1Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. kaarlo.hoppu@hus.fi
Insights
Ensuring children receive needed medicines globally is challenging, especially in poorer nations. Advocacy and collaboration were crucial in adopting the "Better medicines for children" resolution, highlighting science
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Pediatric Pharmacology
- Medicines Access
Background:
- Access to essential medicines for children's health needs is a persistent global issue.
- This problem disproportionately affects middle- and low-income countries where the majority of the world's children reside.
- Previous initiatives in the USA and European Union aimed to address pediatric medicine access.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the global challenge of providing adequate medicines for children's therapeutic requirements.
- To underscore the particular difficulties faced by middle- and low-income countries in pediatric medicine access.
- To document the process and factors contributing to the adoption of a global pediatric medicines initiative.
Main Methods:
- The study describes the global pediatric and pediatric clinical pharmacology community's desire for a World Health Organization (WHO) initiative.
- It notes the WHO's initial resistance to involvement in a dedicated pediatric medicines program.
- The process involved advocacy, networking, cooperation, persistence, and some luck to achieve the resolution.
Main Results:
- The advocacy efforts culminated in the adoption of the "Better medicines for children" resolution 60.20 by the World Health Assembly in May 2007.
- This resolution marked a significant step towards improving access to pediatric medicines globally.
- The success required more than scientific advancement, involving concerted collaborative efforts.
Conclusions:
- Scientific advancements were instrumental in the developments leading to and following the pediatric initiatives.
- However, the World Health Organization's example demonstrates that science alone is insufficient to drive necessary change.
- Sustained advocacy, collaboration, and persistence are vital for global health policy implementation.
Purpose:
Access to medicines filling children's therapeutic needs is a long-standing global problem. The problem has been recognised and initiatives for correction were adopted in the USA in the late 1990s, and in the European Union in the first decade of this century. Paediatric medicines are particularly problematic in middle- and low-income countries, where most of the children of the world live.
Methods:
A paediatric medicines initiative involving the WHO in parallel with the US and EU initiatives was seen as important by the global paediatric and paediatric clinical pharmacology community, but the WHO was resistant to getting involved.
Results:
Advocacy, networking, cooperation, persistence, hard work and some luck were needed to get the "Better medicines for children" resolution 60.20 adopted by the World Health Assembly in May 2007.
Conclusion:
Science has been a key enabler of the developments leading to and following the adoption of the paediatric initiatives, but as the example of the WHO shows, science alone was not enough to make the change.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
