Identification of a coronary-prone profile for business managers: comparison of three approaches to Type A assessment

This study compares three approaches to Type A assessment for identifying a coronary-prone profile for business managers. The Survey of Work Styles (SWS), a profile measure of the Type A behavior pattern, was compared with the Structured Interview (SI), a categorical measure, and with the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS) and Framingham Type A Scale, both continuous measures. The blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac effort of 163 middle-aged male business managers (107 of whom were classified as Type A by the SI) were assessed during the SI. Neither the classification by the SI of the subjects into Type A and non-Type A groups nor Type A1, A2, X, B3, and B4 revealed differences in physiological arousal. Similarly, no relationship was found between physiological variables and Type A behavior that was assessed on a continuum by the JAS or Framingham Type A Scale. When business managers were classified by the SWS according to their pattern of Type A components, however, the results showed that men high on Anger but low on Competitiveness and Job Dissatisfaction had significantly higher levels of systolic blood pressure during the SI. The importance of recognizing individual differences in the expression of Type A behavior when assessing coronary-prone physiological reactivity is discussed.