Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tirzepatide Efficacy and Tolerability According to Early Weight Response: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURMOUNT-1 and SURMOUNT-2 Trials.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2026
Same author

From dysphagia to kidney disease: Alport syndrome with leiomyomatosis.

Kidney international·2026
Same author

The impact of tumor location on oncologic outcomes in laparoscopic parenchymal sparing resection of colorectal liver metastases.

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association·2026
Same author

Over Two Million Life-Years at Risk: Why Gaza's Health Reconstruction Is a Moral Imperative.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

Oropouche virus: transmission, epidemiology, genetic diversity, and public health implications.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Nocturnal blood pressure patterns in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: The Kids Trial study.

Sleep medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy
10:34

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: November 20, 2021

200 consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections performed with a robotically controlled laparoscope holder.

Andrew A Gumbs1, Roland Croner, Angel Rodriguez

  • 1Department of Surgical Oncology, Summit Medical Group, Berkeley Heights, NJ, 07922, USA, aagumbs@gmail.com.

Surgical Endoscopy
|May 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Robotic camera holders in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery allow surgeons to maintain patient contact. This approach integrates robotic benefits while preserving essential tactile feedback for complex procedures.

More Related Videos

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
12:34

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

Published on: January 3, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy
10:34

Robotic Central Pancreatectomy with Roux-en-Y Pancreaticojejunostomy

Published on: November 20, 2021

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique
13:38

Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: a Case Report of a Standardized Technique

Published on: June 24, 2022

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction
12:34

Robot-Assisted Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Including Resection and Reconstruction of the Spleno-Mesenteric Junction

Published on: January 3, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Robotics
  • Pancreatic Surgery

Background:

  • Robotics offer potential benefits in pancreatic surgery.
  • Review of experience at two minimally invasive pancreatic surgery centers.
  • Investigating the role of smaller robots enabling surgeon-patient contact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of robotically controlled laparoscope holders in pancreatic surgery.
  • To determine if smaller robots can enhance outcomes in pancreatic disease treatment.
  • To assess the feasibility of maintaining surgeon-patient contact with robotic assistance.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 200 laparoscopic pancreatic procedures.
  • Procedures utilized a robotically controlled laparoscope holder.
  • Data collected from March 1994 to June 2011.

Main Results:

  • 200 procedures included various pancreatic resections and drainage.
  • 14 patients required conversion to open or hand-assisted surgery.
  • 24 patients experienced major complications, including pancreatic leaks and reoperations.

Conclusions:

  • Robotically assisted approach with camera holders integrates robotic benefits.
  • This method allows surgeons to maintain haptics and patient contact.
  • It represents a current method for incorporating robotics in pancreatic surgery.