Operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a meta-analysis
Guo-dong Liu1, Song-lin Tong, Shan Ou
1Department 8, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, People's Republic of China.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of operative and non-operative treatment on clavicle fractures.
Method:
Relevant clinical trials on the operative and non-operative treatment for clavicle fractures were retrieved through searching the databases MEDLINE, Embase, OVID and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to December 2011. The quality of the included studies was assessed by two authors. A meta-analysis was carried out on homogeneous studies. Five studies involving 633 clavicle fractures were included.
Results:
The differences in nonunion [risk ratio (RR) 0.12, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.29], malunion (RR 0.11, 95 % CI 0.04-0.29) and neurological complications (RR 0.45, 95 % CI 0.25-0.81) were statistically significant between operative and non-operative treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in delayed union (RR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.31-1.95).
Conclusion:
Operative treatment is better than non-operative treatment, but decisions should be made in accordance with specific conditions for clinical application.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
01:26Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History: