Understanding the cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination in children: methodological choices and seasonal

Anthony T Newall1, Juan Pablo Dehollain, Prudence Creighton

  • 1School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. a.newall@unsw.edu.au

Pharmacoeconomics
|May 7, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Universal childhood influenza vaccination is cost-effective if herd immunity is achieved. Methodological choices significantly impact economic evaluations, and seasonal variability in influenza transmission must be considered.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Universal childhood influenza vaccination is increasingly recommended globally.
  • This study addresses the growing consideration of childhood flu vaccination programs in developed nations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the cost-effectiveness of childhood influenza vaccination.
  • To identify key factors influencing the economic viability of pediatric flu immunization.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an age-stratified Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model.
  • Examined the cost-effectiveness of vaccination in Australian schoolchildren as a case study.

Main Results:

  • Methodological choices, such as including herd immunity and specific costs/benefits, critically affect cost-effectiveness outcomes.
  • Including herd protection indicated the vaccination program was likely cost-effective.
  • Seasonal variability in influenza transmission can lead to counter-intuitive results, impacting control ease and benefit realization.

Conclusions:

  • Universal childhood influenza vaccination demonstrates cost-effectiveness potential, contingent on achieving substantial herd protection.
  • Decision-makers must understand the influence of seasonal variability and methodological choices in economic evaluations of influenza vaccination programs.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

Overview
Influenza01:27

Influenza

Influenza is an acute, highly communicable viral disease that affects the respiratory tract and is responsible for seasonal epidemics worldwide. Influenza A is the most prevalent type associated with widespread outbreaks and is subtyped based on two surface glycoproteins: hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N), as in H1N1. These glycoproteins are essential for viral infectivity, transmission, and immune recognition. Transmission occurs primarily through respiratory droplets and contaminated...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...