Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Deciding in the dark: age differences in intuitive risk judgment.
Elizabeth P Shulman1, Elizabeth Cauffman2
1Department of Psychology.
Adolescent risk perception shifts during development, with intuitive risk favorability peaking around age 20. This finding challenges models suggesting early adolescence is the peak period for risk-taking predisposition.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Adolescent risk-taking is a significant concern.
- Previous research often used tasks requiring conscious deliberation.
- The role of intuitive risk appraisal in adolescence is less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate age-related differences in intuitive risk perception.
- To explore how unconscious appraisal of risk changes from childhood through young adulthood.
Main Methods:
- Participants (N=282, ages 10-30) rated depicted activities for risk favorability.
- A rapid exposure time (2.5 seconds) minimized conscious deliberation.
- A continuous scale measured favorability from 'bad idea' to 'good idea'.
Main Results:
- A curvilinear pattern emerged in risk favorability ratings.
- Favorability ratings increased through adolescence, peaking around age 20.
- This pattern contrasts with models emphasizing early adolescence as the peak risk-taking period.
Conclusions:
- Intuitive risk perception evolves significantly during adolescence and young adulthood.
- Findings challenge existing developmental models of risk-taking.
- Results align with observed age patterns in actual risk-taking behaviors like crime and substance use.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Hindsight Biases