Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Clinical Application of Phase Angle and BIVA Z-Score Analyses in Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 30, 2023
Classification of acute decompensated heart failure: an automated algorithm compared with a physician reviewer panel:
Laura R Loehr1, Sunil K Agarwal, Chris Baggett
1Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, 137 E Franklin St, Suite 306, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. lloehr@email.unc.edu
Insights
An automated algorithm for classifying heart failure (HF) hospitalizations showed moderate agreement with physician reviewers. While efficient, its accuracy for acute decompensated HF diagnosis needs improvement.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Informatics
- Clinical Research
Background:
- A new algorithm for classifying heart failure (HF) endpoints using biomarkers and echocardiography was proposed.
- This study evaluated the agreement of this algorithm with a physician reviewer panel.
- Data was abstracted from community-based hospital records.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the agreement between an automated HF classification algorithm and a standardized physician reviewer panel.
- To evaluate the accuracy of contemporary HF classification methods in real-world clinical data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized hospitalization data from 4 US communities (2005-2007) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.
- An automated HF classification algorithm was applied to 2729 hospitalizations with biomarker or ejection fraction data.
- Compared automated algorithm results against a standardized physician reviewer panel (ARIC reviewers).
Main Results:
- The automated algorithm classified 54% of hospitalizations as acute decompensated HF, versus 68% by the physician panel.
- Chance-corrected agreement (κ=0.39) between the automated algorithm and physician panel was moderate.
- The algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.68 and specificity of 0.75 when compared to the physician panel.
Conclusions:
- The automated algorithm offers improved efficiency and reduced costs for HF hospitalization classification.
- However, the algorithm's accuracy in classifying heart failure hospitalizations was modest compared to expert physician review.
- Further refinement of automated algorithms is needed for reliable clinical application.
Background:
An algorithm to classify heart failure (HF) end points inclusive of contemporary measures of biomarkers and echocardiography was recently proposed by an international expert panel. Our objective was to assess agreement of HF classification by this contemporaneous algorithm with that by a standardized physician reviewer panel, when applied to data abstracted from community-based hospital records.
Methods And Results:
During 2005-2007, all hospitalizations were identified from 4 US communities under surveillance as part of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Potential HF hospitalizations were sampled by International Classification of Diseases discharge codes and demographics from men and women aged ≥ 55 years. The HF classification algorithm was automated and applied to 2729 (n=13854 weighted hospitalizations) hospitalizations in which either brain natriuretic peptide measures or ejection fraction were documented (mean age, 75 years). There were 1403 (54%; n=7534 weighted) events classified as acute decompensated HF by the automated algorithm, and 1748 (68%; n=9276 weighted) such events by the ARIC reviewer panel. The chance-corrected agreement between acute decompensated HF by physician reviewer panel and the automated algorithm was moderate (κ=0.39). Sensitivity and specificity of the automated algorithm with ARIC reviewer panel as the referent standard were 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.69) and 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.76), respectively.
Conclusions:
Although the automated classification improved efficiency and decreased costs, its accuracy in classifying HF hospitalizations was modest compared with a standardized physician reviewer panel.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
