Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lessons from Canada's health program.

M Terris

    Journal of Public Health Policy
    |January 1, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Canadian health program offers universal coverage and low administrative costs but faces rising expenses due to fee-for-service physician payments and insufficient focus on preventive care. Recommendations suggest improvements for a potential U.S. national health program.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Determinants of health: a progressive political platform.

    New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS·2012
    Same author

    Background of current trends in the relation of public health to medical care.

    American journal of public health and the nation's health·2010
    Same author

    Hermann Biggs' contribution to the modern concept of the health center.

    Bulletin of the history of medicine·2010
    Same author

    Introduction: Origins and growth of group practice.

    Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine·2009
    Same author

    The changing relationships of epidemiology and society: the Robert Cruickshank Lecture.

    Journal of public health policy·2002
    Same author

    Public health or private profit: where does the American Public Health Association stand?

    Journal of public health policy·2001
    Same journal

    Trust in transition in the United States: examining health equity priorities, 2021-2024.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Bridging borders for eliminating vector-borne diseases: a shared responsibility for the Indian states.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Disentangling disparities in children's development.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Ethical and public health lessons from Ethiopia's first Marburg virus disease outbreak.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Chikungunya virus resurgence in Africa: a call for action.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    Same journal

    Local governance dynamics in the Colombian health system: an exploratory cross-sectional study among public health sector officials.

    Journal of public health policy·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Policy Analysis
    • Comparative Health Systems
    • Public Health Administration

    Background:

    • The Canadian health program provides universal access to physician and hospital services.
    • It is financed through progressive taxation, minimizing administrative costs by excluding private insurers.
    • Decentralization to provinces avoids a rigid federal system.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the Canadian health program.
    • To identify key features for a potential U.S. national health program.
    • To offer recommendations for improving health system design and outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Descriptive analysis of the Canadian health program's structure and financing.
    • Comparative evaluation of its features against potential U.S. healthcare reforms.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of positive and negative aspects based on program outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Positive aspects include progressive financing, comprehensive coverage, no patient cost-sharing, and lower administrative costs.
    • Negative aspects involve escalating costs driven by fee-for-service models, inadequate quality monitoring, and underfunding of preventive services.
    • The program's success is limited by neglecting social determinants of health.

    Conclusions:

    • The Canadian model demonstrates successful universal coverage and cost efficiency in administration.
    • Addressing rising costs and enhancing preventive care are crucial for long-term sustainability and population health.
    • Lessons learned can inform the development of a more effective U.S. national health program.