Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke
Published on: September 1, 2023
Ipsilateral motor pathways after stroke: implications for non-invasive brain stimulation
Lynley V Bradnam1, Cathy M Stinear, Winston D Byblow
1Brain Research Laboratory, Centre for Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Flinders University Adelaide, SA, Australia ; Effectiveness of Therapy Group, Centre for Clinical Change and Healthcare Research, School of Medicine, Flinders University Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) may hinder stroke recovery by suppressing pathways crucial for arm control. Considering ipsilateral pathways like the cortico-reticulo-propriospinal pathway (CRPP) is vital before applying NBS to the contralesional motor cortex.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Motor Control
Background:
- The two cerebral hemispheres play critical roles in controlling the upper limb in humans.
- Stroke often impairs upper limb function, necessitating effective rehabilitation strategies.
- Non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) is explored for stroke recovery, typically targeting the primary motor cortex (M1).
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the significance of ipsilateral descending pathways in functional recovery post-stroke.
- To examine the implications of contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) suppression via NBS.
- To propose a neurophysiological model for ipsilesional arm control via the cortico-reticulo-propriospinal pathway (CRPP).
Main Methods:
- Review of neurophysiological models concerning ipsilateral descending pathways.
- Discussion of the cortico-reticulo-propriospinal pathway (CRPP) as a potential control mechanism.
- Consideration of neurophysiological, neuroimaging, and clinical assessments for treatment decisions.
Main Results:
- Contralesional M1 suppression via NBS may inadvertently reduce the excitability of crucial ipsilateral descending pathways.
- The cortico-reticulo-propriospinal pathway (CRPP) represents a significant ipsilateral pathway for paretic upper limb control.
- The effectiveness of NBS protocols must be individualized based on the patient's specific neurophysiological profile.
Conclusions:
- The role of the CRPP in motor control for individual stroke patients needs careful consideration before applying NBS.
- Suppression of contralesional M1 may not always be beneficial and could impede recovery via ipsilateral pathways.
- Integrating various assessment methods can guide the clinical application of NBS for optimizing stroke rehabilitation.
More Related Videos
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014
09:52Measuring and Manipulating Functionally Specific Neural Pathways in the Human Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 23, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Indirect Motor Pathways
The vestibulospinal tract originates in the vestibular nuclei of the brainstem. The vestibular system detects changes in...
Direct Motor Pathways
The corticospinal tract is responsible for the voluntary movement of the limbs and trunk. It originates in the cerebral cortex of the brain and descends through the cerebrum's internal capsule and the...