Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
Published on: July 1, 2015
The temporal priority principle: at what age does this develop?
Michelle L Rankin1, Teresa McCormack
1School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast Belfast, Country Antrim, Northern Ireland.
Insights
Children
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Developmental Psychology
- Causal Reasoning
Background:
- The temporal priority principle posits that causes must precede effects.
- Children's causal reasoning is assumed to follow this principle early in development.
- Previous research on children's understanding of temporal priority yielded inconsistent findings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate 3- and 4-year-old children's understanding of the temporal priority principle.
- To examine age-related changes in causal reasoning.
- To assess the impact of effect visibility on performance.
Main Methods:
- 100 children (50 3-year-olds, 50 4-year-olds) participated.
- Children judged which of two events (A or B) caused an effect (E).
- Event visibility was manipulated.
Main Results:
- Both age groups performed above chance, with performance improving with age.
- The visibility of the effect did not significantly impact performance.
- No recency effect was observed in younger children's choices.
Conclusions:
- Children's grasp of the temporal priority principle develops between ages 3 and 4.
- Performance improves with age, suggesting a developmental progression in causal reasoning.
- Factors like effect visibility and recency effects do not appear to significantly influence this developmental trajectory.
Abstract:
The temporal priority principle states that all causes must precede their effects. It is widely assumed that children's causal reasoning is guided by this principle from early in development. However, the empirical studies that have examined children's use of the principle, most of which were conducted some decades ago, in fact show inconsistent findings. Some researchers have argued that 3-year-olds reliably use this principle, whereas others have suggested that it is not until 5 years that children properly grasp the inviolability of the principle. To examine this issue, 100 children, 50 three-year-olds, and 50 four-year-olds, took part in a study in which they had to judge which of two causes yielded an effect. In the task, children saw one event (A), an effect (E), and then another event (B). The events A and B involved the rolling of balls down runways, and the effect E was a Jack-in-a-box popping up. The extent to which E left a visible trace was also varied, because comparisons across previous studies suggested that this may affect performance. As a group, 3- and 4-year-olds performed at above-chance levels, but performance improved with age. The nature of the effect did not have a significant impact on performance. Although some previous studies suggested that 3-year-olds may be more likely to choose B rather than A as a cause due to a recency effect, we found no evidence of this pattern of performance in the younger group. Potential explanations of the age-related improvement in performance are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Psychosexual Stages of Personality: Latency
The latency period is not considered...
The Nativist Approach
Information Processing Approach
Cognitive Development During Adolescence

