Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

08:15
Visualizing Oceanographic Data to Depict Long-term Changes in Phytoplankton
Published on: July 28, 2023
Change in fish community structure in the Barents Sea
Michaela Aschan1, Maria Fossheim, Michael Greenacre
1Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. michaela.aschan@uit.no
Plos One
|May 10, 2013
Summary
Barents Sea fish communities changed due to oceanography and fishing. Biomass and abundance declined significantly between 1996-1999, with lasting impacts on the ecosystem structure.
Area of Science:
- Marine Ecology
- Fisheries Science
- Oceanography
Background:
- Marine fish communities are sensitive to oceanographic changes, but ecosystem-wide impacts are often overlooked.
- Traditional monitoring often focuses on commercial species and oceanography, not the whole ecosystem.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze spatial and temporal shifts in the Barents Sea fish community (1992-2004).
- To correlate changes with abiotic factors and biodiversity patterns for 82 fish species.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of fish community structure, abundance, and biodiversity.
- Correlation with environmental factors like temperature and depth.
- Assessment of biomass, mean fish weight, and pelagic/demersal ratio.
Main Results:
- Fish community structure was dictated by temperature and depth, forming distinct deep, southern (Atlantic water), and northeastern (mixed water) assemblages.
- A significant decline in fish biomass, abundance, and mean weight occurred from 1996-1999, with an increased pelagic/demersal ratio.
- Post-1999, community variables did not revert to early 1990s levels despite normalized fishing and climate conditions.
Conclusions:
- Abiotic factors significantly structure Barents Sea fish communities.
- A severe cold spell in 1996, combined with high fishing pressure, caused a lasting shift in fish community structure.
- Ecosystem resilience is challenged, with slow recovery post-disturbance.
Related Concept Videos
Marine Microbial Ecology
Marine microbial ecosystems are shaped by distinct physicochemical limits, including high salinity, low nutrient availability, and fluctuating oxygen levels. These conditions favor smaller microbial cell sizes, which maximize their surface-to-volume ratio for efficient nutrient uptake.Microbial activity and community composition are closely linked to biogeochemical cycles, particularly in dynamic environments like estuaries, where halotolerant microbes thrive in response to variable salinity...
Keystone Species
Measures of species biodiversity, such as richness (i.e., the number of species present) and evenness (i.e., their relative abundance), describe an ecological community’s structure. Many factors affect community structure, including abiotic factors (e.g., sunlight and nutrients), disturbances (e.g., fire or flood), species interactions (e.g., predation or competition), and chance events (e.g., foreign species invasion). Certain species—such as keystone species—also play a pivotal role in the...
Speciation Rates
Overview
Deep Sea Microbial Ecology
The deep ocean and its underlying sediments represent vast, largely unexplored microbial habitats that extend far beyond the sunlit photic zone. The photic (euphotic) zone typically spans the upper ~100–200 meters of pelagic waters in the open ocean, but its depth varies geographically and seasonally, where sufficient light supports photosynthetic life. Below this lies the deep sea, spanning roughly 1000–6000 meters (bathypelagic to abyssal zones), with deeper hadal trenches extending beyond...
Freshwater Microbial Ecology
Freshwater systems such as streams, rivers, and lakes exhibit distinct physical and biological characteristics that influence their microbial communities. These environments are broadly categorized into lotic systems—those with flowing waters like streams and most rivers—and lentic systems, which include still or slow-moving waters such as lakes, ponds, and marshes.In lentic systems, phytoplankton drive primary production, generating autochthonous organic carbon. In contrast, lotic systems...
