Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Unformed minds: juveniles, neuroscience, and the law
1Graduate Program in Science Technology and Society, Bar Ilan University, Israel. oren.harman@gmail.com
Abstract:
Recently, the question of adolescent culpability has been brought before the Supreme Court of the United States for reconsideration. Neuroscience, adolescent advocates claim, is teaching us that young people cannot be found fully responsible for their actions. The reason: their brains are not fully formed. Here I consider the history of the use of scientific evidence in the courtroom, a number of adolescent murder cases, and the data now emerging from neuroscience, and argue that when it comes to brains, judges, just like the rest of us, are unnecessarily impressed. Ultimately, how we determine culpability should rest on normative and ethical considerations rather than on scientific ones.
Related Concept Videos
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Models, Theories, and Laws
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...

