Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

10:17
Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
Published on: October 5, 2017
9.2K
Intraspecific trait variation and its effects on food chains
1US Geological Survey and Department of Biology, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33143, USA. ddeangelis@bio.miami.edu
Mathematical Biosciences
|May 11, 2013
Summary
Intraspecific variation in consumer foraging and anti-predator traits can stabilize food chains. Two consumer phenotypes coexist, altering predator-prey dynamics and stabilizing the ecosystem.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Population Dynamics
- Food Web Theory
Background:
- Intraspecific variation in traits like foraging and anti-predator defense influences community dynamics.
- Tritrophic food chains with intermediate consumers exhibiting variation are key to understanding ecosystem stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the implications of intraspecific variation in a consumer population within a tritrophic food chain.
- To investigate the coexistence of two consumer phenotypes with trade-offs in foraging and anti-predator defense.
Main Methods:
- Modeling a diamond-shaped food web topology with two distinct consumer phenotypes.
- Analyzing the stability conditions and population dynamics under intraspecific variation.
Main Results:
- Unlike competing species, two consumer phenotypes within a single species can stably coexist due to switching between subpopulations.
- The presence of two stable phenotypes alters bottom-up and top-down effects, with predators impacting resources directly, not consumer subpopulations.
- Resource carrying capacity changes affect consumer subpopulations but not predator or resource populations.
Conclusions:
- Intraspecific variation can stabilize food chains by allowing for the coexistence of distinct phenotypes.
- This coexistence reshapes the traditional understanding of top-down and bottom-up ecological effects in food webs.
Related Concept Videos
Trophic Efficiency
24.9K
Trophic level transfer efficiency (TLTE) is a measure of the total energy transfer from one trophic level to the next. Due to extensive energy loss as metabolic heat, an average of only 10% of the original energy obtained is passed on to the next level. This pattern of energy loss severely limits the possible number of trophic levels in a food chain.
24.9K
Limits to Natural Selection
33.9K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
33.9K
Predator-Prey Interactions
20.9K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
20.9K
What is Natural Selection?
125.3K
Natural selection is an evolutionary process in which individuals with survival-promoting traits reproduce at higher rates. These favorable traits become more common within a population or species. Naturally selected traits initially arise via random genetic mutations. In order for selection to occur, there must be variation within a population, the trait controlling the variation must be heritable, and there must be an evolutionary advantage for variation in the trait.
125.3K
Competition
24.2K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
24.2K
Frequency-dependent Selection
23.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
23.0K

