Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Probability in Statistics

Probability in Statistics

Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Probability Distributions

Probability Distributions

The probability of a random variable x is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson probability...

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Prostate cancer screening: Decision-making when MRI results are inconclusive for cancer (PI-RADS 3).

Urologic oncology·2026

Same author

Adjusting for non-compliance and contamination with a more plausible assumption.

Journal of medical screening·2026

Same author

The efficient stored specimen design for evaluating multiple screening technologies: Application to multicancer detection tests.

Journal of medical screening·2025

Same author

Minimum test tradeoff applied to uterine artery pulsatility index for antepartum prediction of preeclampsia.

Pregnancy hypertension·2025

Same author

The Role of the Extracellular Matrix in Cancer Prevention.

Cancers·2025

Same author

Letter to the editor regarding "Early detection of pancreatic cancer: Study design and analytical considerations in biomarker discovery and early phase validation studies".

Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.]·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Causal inference, probability theory, and graphical insights.

Stuart G Baker¹

¹Biometry Research Group, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. sb16i@nih.gov

Statistics in Medicine

|May 11, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Probability theory offers a flexible and sufficient foundation for causal inference from observational studies, surpassing limitations of causal graphs. This approach enhances understanding of biases and introduces novel designs and graphical tools for complex causal relationships.

Keywords:

BK-Plot Simpson's paradox causal graph confounder instrumental variable observational study

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Causal Inference
Probability Theory

Background:

Causal inference from observational studies is crucial in biostatistics.
Traditional causal graph literature often deems probability theory inadequate for expressing causal concepts.
This study challenges that view, advocating for probability theory's sufficiency and desirability.

Purpose of the Study:

To demonstrate that probability theory is a sufficient and desirable foundation for causal inference.
To highlight the flexibility of probability theory over causal graphs in addressing complex causal issues.
To introduce novel graphical tools and designs rooted in probability theory for enhanced causal analysis.

Main Methods:

Utilizing probability theory to explain and extend concepts typically addressed by causal graphs, such as M-bias and instrumental variable biases.
Developing and applying graphical displays like the BK-Plot, BK2-Plot, and PAD-Plot for visualizing and understanding specific causal phenomena.
Establishing probability theory as the basis for the paired availability design with historical controls, a method not easily represented by causal graphs.

Main Results:

Probability theory provides a more flexible framework than causal graphs, explaining phenomena like M-bias and bias amplification/attenuation.
The paired availability design for historical controls is effectively founded on probability theory, offering a new perspective.
Insightful graphical displays (BK-Plot, BK2-Plot, PAD-Plot) derived from probability theory aid in understanding Simpson's paradox and various bias types.

Conclusions:

Probability theory is a robust and versatile foundation for causal inference, offering advantages over traditional causal graph approaches.
The study introduces innovative methods and visualizations that enhance the understanding and application of causal inference techniques.
This work advocates for a probability-centric approach in biostatistics for tackling complex observational data challenges.