Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
The failure of biologics in sepsis: where do we stand?
Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis1
14th Department of Internal Medicine, University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece. egiamarel@med.uoa.gr
Abstract:
The failure of the PROWESS-SHOCK study of recombinant human activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa) has generated much scepticism about the future of immunomodulatory interventions in sepsis. This review presents a summary of the few remaining promising strategies for immunointervention. These comprise intravenous clarithromycin, haemoperfusion through a polymyxin B-embedded fibre device (PMX-B), recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) and intravenous immunoglobulin preparations enriched in IgM and IgA (IgMA). The great heterogeneity in the pathophysiology of sepsis mandates a highly individualised approach. This approach comprises: septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome arising in the field of ventilator-associated pneumonia as an indication for intravenous clarithromycin; abdominal severe sepsis/shock for PMX-B haemoperfusion; sepsis and acute coagulopathy for rTM; and early septic shock for IgMA. However, specific diagnostic tools should be developed to make this personalised approach more robust.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Upstream Processing

