Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effective Connectivity-based Unsupervised Channel Selection Method for Electroencephalography.

Journal of medical signals and sensors·2026
Same author

EDSF-Net : An enhanced dynamic spatiotemporal-frequency attention network for robust EEG decoding in motor imagery.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2026
Same author

Breaking the Depth Barrier in Motor Imagery Classification via a Residual Depthwise-Separable Network.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same author

Enhancing Target Recognition Performance in SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces via Deep Neural Networks With Pyramid Squeeze Attention.

IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society·2026
Same author

Enhancing the Capability and Accuracy of Motor Imagery Classification: A Deep Neural Network-Powered Multifaceted Strategy Model.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same author

TBMSCCN: Two-Branch Multi-Scale Convolutional Correlation Network for Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Classification.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2026
Same journal

Risk Factors for White Matter Lesion Burden in Adults with Focal Epilepsy.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Isolated Paroxysmal Right Upward Eye Deviation as the Sole Semiology of Childhood Occipital Epilepsy: An Electroclinical Case Report.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Hyperkinetic Seizures in Insular and Insulo-Opercular Seizure Onset: A Systematic Review.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Aperiodic Correction of Posterior Theta/Alpha Ratio Reduces Arousal-State Dependency in Routine EEG-Based Dementia Screening.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2026
Same journal

QEEG Guided Neurofeedback to Enhance Intellectual Functioning in Children with Intellectual Disability.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Brain Activity Changes Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-Stroke Motor Recovery: A Narrative Review.

Clinical EEG and neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

Automated artifact removal from the electroencephalogram: a comparative study.

Ian Daly1, Nicoletta Nicolaou, Slawomir Jaroslaw Nasuto

  • 1Institute for Knowledge Discovery, Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interfaces, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.

Clinical EEG and Neuroscience
|May 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated electroencephalogram (EEG) artifact removal methods were compared. Blind source separation (BSS) excelled with high signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), while multivariate singular spectrum analysis (MSSA) performed better at low SNRs, despite more false positives.

Keywords:
Automated artifact removalBlind source separation (BSS)Independent component analysis (ICA)Multivariate singular spectrum analysis (MSSA)Temporal de-correlation source separation (TDSEP)Wavelets

More Related Videos

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI
10:35

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG), Electromyography (EMG), and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy
10:23

Equipment Setup and Artifact Removal for Simultaneous Electroencephalogram and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Review in Epilepsy

Published on: June 23, 2023

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI
10:35

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal quality is often compromised by artifacts, necessitating automated removal techniques.
  • Existing automated artifact removal methods lack standardized, rigorous comparative evaluations, relying heavily on subjective visual inspection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a comparative analysis of distinct automated methods for removing blink, electrocardiographic, and electromyographic artifacts from EEG data.
  • To establish objective performance metrics for evaluating artifact removal techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Three automated artifact correction methods were investigated: wavelet-based correction, blind source separation (BSS), and multivariate singular spectrum analysis (MSSA).
  • These methods were applied to EEG datasets containing simulated mixtures of artifacts.
  • Novel metrics were developed to quantify the efficacy and accuracy of each artifact removal technique.

Main Results:

  • Blind source separation (BSS) demonstrated superior performance in removing artifacts with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
  • Multivariate singular spectrum analysis (MSSA) showed effectiveness in low SNR conditions but resulted in a higher rate of false positive artifact identifications.
  • Performance varied significantly across methods depending on artifact SNR.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of automated artifact removal method for EEG should be guided by the expected signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the artifacts.
  • BSS is recommended for high SNR artifact removal, while MSSA may be considered for low SNR scenarios with careful consideration of its false positive rate.
  • Further research is needed to refine MSSA and develop hybrid approaches for comprehensive EEG artifact management.