Acute lymphoblastic leukemia experience: epidemiology and outcome of two different regimens

Salah Abbasi1, Faten Maleha, Muhannad Shobaki

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

Insights

Accurate data on adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment in Jordan is presented. The Hyper-CVAD and CALGB 8811 regimens showed similar efficacy, with BCR-ABL translocation being a poor prognostic factor.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Limited data exists on adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment outcomes in Jordan.
  • The King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) initiated a study to address this data gap.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the demographics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes of adult ALL patients at KHCC.
  • To compare the efficacy of two chemotherapy protocols: Hyper-CVAD and CALGB 8811.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical records for adult ALL patients treated at KHCC between January 2007 and December 2011.
  • Analysis of patient demographics, immunophenotype, BCR-ABL translocation status, treatment regimens, response rates, and survival data.

Main Results:

  • 108 adult ALL patients were treated, with a median age of 33 years; 63% were male.
  • Complete response rate was 88%. Median survival was 30 months, and median CR duration was 28 months.
  • BCR-ABL translocation was the sole poor prognostic factor (p<0.01), associated with reduced median survival (23 months). No significant difference in outcomes was observed between the Hyper-CVAD and CALGB 8811 regimens.

Conclusions:

  • International treatment protocols for adult ALL can be successfully implemented in the Jordanian population.
  • The Hyper-CVAD and CALGB 8811 regimens demonstrated comparable efficacy in this cohort.
  • Future research should explore targeted agents and minimal residual disease monitoring to enhance treatment outcomes for adult ALL.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Treatment Resistant Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistant Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...