Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026
07:14
A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia: qualitative systematic review
Sarah F Barnett1, Ravi K Alagar, Michael P W Grocott
1University College London/University College London Hospital, Surgical Outcomes ResearchCentre, University, College Hospital, London, UK. sarahfbarnett@googlemail.com
Anesthesiology
|May 15, 2013
Summary
Patient satisfaction surveys are crucial for healthcare quality assessment. This review identified validated anesthesia satisfaction tools, recommending their use to ensure accurate and unbiased patient outcome reporting.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Health Services Research
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality.
- Existing research indicates a scarcity of validated questionnaires for measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia.
- This gap can lead to biased and inaccurate quality improvement study results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and identify patient satisfaction tools for anesthesia that have undergone psychometric validation.
- To appraise the quality of the development and validation processes of these tools.
- To recommend suitable instruments for various clinical and academic settings.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review.
- Identification of anesthesia patient satisfaction questionnaires.
- Appraisal of psychometric properties and validation quality.
Main Results:
- Several robustly developed and validated instruments for measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia exist.
- A significant number of studies continue to utilize non-validated or poorly developed tools.
- The use of non-validated tools compromises the accuracy and reliability of reported patient satisfaction data.
Conclusions:
- Validated tools for assessing patient satisfaction with anesthesia are available.
- Encouraging the use of these validated instruments is essential for accurate and fair reporting.
- Adoption of validated tools will improve the quality of research and clinical practice in anesthesiology.
Related Concept Videos
01:22Stages of General Anesthesia
Various sedation levels offer significant advantages in facilitating procedural interventions for patients undergoing medical or invasive surgical procedures. These levels span from anxiolysis to general anesthesia, providing a spectrum of sedative effects to cater to specific patient needs. Anxiolysis reduces anxiety and is achieved through minimal sedation, enabling patients to remain awake and responsive while feeling more at ease during the procedure. This level can benefit minor...
01:24General Anesthesia: Overview
Anesthesia is a medical procedure that uses drugs for CNS suppression to enable painless surgeries and procedures. The selection of anesthetics is influenced by their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and patient characteristics. Various types of anesthesia include general, local, regional, spinal, and inhalational.
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
01:15Nursing Evaluation
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Section...
01:17Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Assessing the gastrointestinal (GI) system is a complex process that begins with collecting subjective data. This data, collected through patient interviews, provides crucial insights into the patient's health history, perception patterns, and lifestyle habits, all contributing significantly to GI health.
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
01:26Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
01:20Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalation anesthetics are drugs that induce general anesthesia upon inhalation. They work by increasing the sensitivity of GABAA receptors or inhibiting NMDA receptors, leading to a decrease in central nervous system activity. The depth of anesthesia can be rapidly adjusted by changing the concentration of the inhaled gas. Some common examples of inhalational anesthetics include volatile liquids like isoflurane, desflurane, sevoflurane and gases like xenon and nitrous oxide. Isoflurane, a...