A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of Endostar in patients with metastatic

Chuanliang Cui1, Lili Mao, Zhihong Chi

  • 1Department of Renal Cancer and Melanoma, The Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Ministry of Education, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

Insights

Recombinant human endostatin (rhES) combined with dacarbazine significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients lacking common genetic mutations. This combination therapy demonstrated a favorable safety profile, offering a new treatment avenue.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Research
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Endostatin is an endogenous angiogenic inhibitor with potential antitumor effects.
  • Clinical efficacy of recombinant human endostatin (rhES) in cancer treatment remains under investigation.
  • The role of rhES in metastatic melanoma, particularly in patients without specific genetic mutations, requires further evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of a soluble and stable rhES formulation (Endostar) combined with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma.
  • To evaluate the impact of Endostar plus dacarbazine on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in this patient population.
  • To determine the tolerability and toxicity profile of the Endostar plus dacarbazine regimen.

Main Methods:

  • A phase II clinical trial involving 110 patients with metastatic melanoma lacking c-kit and BRAF mutations.
  • Patients were randomized to receive either Endostar (7.5 mg/m²) plus dacarbazine (250 mg/m²) or placebo plus dacarbazine (250 mg/m²).
  • Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Main Results:

  • Median PFS was significantly improved in the Endostar plus dacarbazine arm (4.5 months) compared to the placebo arm (1.5 months) (HR = 0.578; P = 0.013).
  • Overall survival (OS) was also significantly extended in the Endostar plus dacarbazine group (median 12.0 months) versus placebo (median 8.0 months) (HR = 0.522; P = 0.005).
  • The Endostar plus dacarbazine regimen was well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile.

Conclusions:

  • Endostar plus dacarbazine demonstrates significant improvements in PFS and OS for metastatic melanoma patients without common targeted therapy mutations.
  • The combination therapy is well-tolerated and presents a viable treatment option for this specific patient group.
  • Further investigation into rhES as a therapeutic agent for metastatic melanoma is warranted.