Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference and Diffraction02:18

Interference and Diffraction

Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Design Example01:23

Design Example

The innovation of touch-tone telephony revolutionized the telecommunications industry by replacing the traditional rotary dial with a dual-tone multi-frequency (DTMF) signaling system. This system uses a matrix-style keypad with buttons arranged in four rows and three columns, creating 12 distinct signals each assigned to a pair of frequencies. Each button press results in a simultaneous generation of two sinusoidal tones – one from a low-frequency group (697 to 941 Hz) and one from a...
Interference and Superposition of Waves01:07

Interference and Superposition of Waves

When two waves of the same nature occur in the same region simultaneously, they result in interference. Interference of waves implies that the net effect of the waves is the sum of the individual waves' effects. However, it does not imply that the individual waves affect the propagation of other waves.
Interference occurs in mechanical waves, such as sound waves, waves on a string, and surface water waves. Mechanical waves correspond to the physical displacement of particles. Hence,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association between endothelial activation and stress index and mortality in critically ill patients with diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study.

BMC endocrine disorders·2026
Same author

Self-Templated Hierarchically Porous Graphitic Aerogels for Emi Shielding.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2026
Same author

Compact, reconfigurable, and scalable photonic neurons by modulation-and-weighting microring resonators.

eLight·2026
Same author

Neuromorphic photonic computing with an electro-optic analog memory.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Online training and pruning of multi-wavelength photonic neural networks.

Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany)·2025
Same author

Emerging integrated photonic technologies leveraging multimaterial integration for AI and datacenter applications [Invited].

Optics express·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Performance comparison of optical interference cancellation system architectures.

Maddie Lu1, Matt Chang, Yanhua Deng

  • 1Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA. madelilu@princeton.edu

Applied Optics
|May 15, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optical interference cancellation systems outperform electronic methods. A new set of metrics reveals optical advantages in depth, range, loss, and uniformity for superior performance.

More Related Videos

Characterization of SiN Integrated Optical Phased Arrays on a Wafer-Scale Test Station
05:57

Characterization of SiN Integrated Optical Phased Arrays on a Wafer-Scale Test Station

Published on: April 1, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
05:14

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Characterization of SiN Integrated Optical Phased Arrays on a Wafer-Scale Test Station
05:57

Characterization of SiN Integrated Optical Phased Arrays on a Wafer-Scale Test Station

Published on: April 1, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Photonics and Signal Processing
  • Optical Engineering
  • Telecommunications

Background:

  • Interference is a significant challenge in optical communication systems.
  • Traditional electronic interference cancellation methods have limitations.
  • Optical approaches offer potential for improved performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of three optics-based interference cancellation systems.
  • To contrast optical systems with traditional electronic techniques.
  • To introduce a novel set of performance metrics for evaluating interference cancellation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a common set of performance metrics.
  • Evaluation of three distinct optics-based interference cancellation systems.
  • Comparative analysis against traditional electronic cancellation methods.

Main Results:

  • Optical interference cancellation systems demonstrate superior performance over electronic methods.
  • Key performance metrics include depth of cancellation, dynamic range, link loss, and uniformity.
  • The proposed metrics provide a thorough evaluation framework for optical approaches.

Conclusions:

  • Optics-based interference cancellation surpasses traditional electronic techniques.
  • The choice of an optimal optical interference canceller depends on the discussed performance metrics.
  • Further research into optical interference cancellation is warranted.