Computer-assisted versus manual TKA: no difference in clinical or functional outcomes at 5-year follow-up

The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in clinical, functional, or radiographic outcomes existed at 5-year follow-up between patients who underwent computer-assisted or manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Seventy-eight consecutive TKAs were performed by a single surgeon who had extensive experience performing computer-assisted and manual TKA. The manual group (n=40) and computer-assisted group (n=38) were similar with regard to age, sex, diagnosis, body mass index, surgical technique, implants, perioperative management, Knee Society scores, and anteroposterior mechanical axis. Sixty-three (manual group, n=34; computer-assisted group, n=29) patients were available for final follow-up. At 5-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were found in Knee Society knee score (P=.289), function score (P=.272), range of motion (P=.284), pain score (P=.432), or UCLA activity score (P=.109) between the 2 groups. Postoperative radiographs showed a significant difference in the mechanical axis (P=.004) between the 2 groups; however, both groups achieved a neutral mechanical axis of ±3° (computer-assisted group mean, 2.0°; manual group mean, -0.24°).When TKA was performed by an experienced surgeon, no significant difference was identified at 5-year follow-up between patients who underwent computer-assisted vs manual TKA.