Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle

The Uncertainty Principle

Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He mathematically...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...

Probability in Statistics

Probability in Statistics

Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Distinct metabolomic and lipidomic profiles across donation after circulatory death recovery strategies reveal a common signature associated with primary graft dysfunction.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026

Same author

A four-step simulation-based workflow for ecological analysis and science.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026

Same author

FDA Draft Guidance for the Use of Bayesian Methods in Clinical Trials.

JAMA·2026

Same author

Pathfinder: Parallel quasi-Newton variational inference.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026

Same author

Multilevel regression and poststratification interface: an application to track community-level COVID-19 viral transmission.

Population health metrics·2026

Same author

A multilevel Bayesian approach to climate-fueled migration and conflict.

Scientific reports·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Does quantum uncertainty have a place in everyday applied statistics?

Andrew Gelman¹, Michael Betancourt

¹Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. gelman@stat.columbia.edu

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|May 16, 2013

Summary

Quantum probability models can advance social and behavioral sciences. This research suggests focusing on marginal probabilities, rather than complex probability amplitudes, for more effective quantum modeling in these fields.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Quantum Social Science
Behavioral Economics

Background:

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is relevant to social and behavioral sciences.
Measurement in these fields can influence participants.
Previous work by Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) proposed complex probability-amplitude formulations for quantum models.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose an alternative approach for developing quantum probability models in social and behavioral sciences.
To suggest a more general method for applying quantum principles to human behavior.
To refine the application of quantum mechanics in psychological research.

Main Methods:

Critique of direct application of probability-amplitude formulation.
Proposal of a generalized approach using marginal probabilities.
Focus on the mathematical structure of quantum probability relevant to behavioral data.

Main Results:

The direct use of complex probability-amplitude formulation may not be the optimal approach.
Considering marginal probabilities offers a more flexible and generalizable method.
This approach avoids the need for averaging over conditionals, simplifying model development.

Conclusions:

Quantum probability models can be valuable tools for social and behavioral sciences.
A marginal probability approach provides a more accessible and effective framework.
This research offers a refined perspective on applying quantum theory to human behavior and decision-making.