Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Walk with Me Hybrid Virtual/In-Person Walking for Older Adults with Neurodegenerative Disease
Published on: June 16, 2023
A new urban planning code's impact on walking: the residential environments project
Hayley Christian1, Matthew Knuiman, Fiona Bull
1Centre for Built Environment and Health, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia. hayley.christian@uwa.edu.au
New housing developments designed for livable neighborhoods created more supportive environments but did not increase walking. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term impact of urban planning policies on physical activity.
Area of Science:
- Urban planning and public health
- Environmental psychology
- Built environment and physical activity
Background:
- State government livable neighborhoods subdivision codes aim to create supportive environments for physical activity.
- Understanding the impact of these codes on resident behavior is crucial for effective urban planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if residents of housing developments built to livable neighborhoods standards walk more than those in conventional developments.
- To assess the influence of the built environment and resident perceptions on walking behavior.
Main Methods:
- A natural experiment involving 1813 participants across 73 new housing developments in Perth, Western Australia.
- Pre- and post-relocation surveys (12 and 36 months) measuring self-reported walking (Neighborhood Physical Activity Questionnaire), environmental perceptions, and self-selection factors.
- Objective built environment measures using Geographic Information System (GIS).
Main Results:
- Livable developments exhibited superior street connectivity, residential density, land use mix, and destination accessibility compared to conventional developments (P < .05).
- Residents in livable developments reported more positive neighborhood perceptions (P < .05).
- No significant differences in walking behavior were observed between residents of livable and conventional developments over time (P > .05).
Conclusions:
- While the Livable Neighborhoods Guidelines successfully created more supportive built environments, the intervention intensity was insufficient to promote increased walking.
- Longer-term follow-up evaluations are essential to fully assess the impact of new urban planning policies on resident behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground cistern.
Schemas
Movement Joints in Buildings
The simplest type of movement joints, working joints, are...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Habitat Fragmentation
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
