Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra. Schrödinger...

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Temperature Dependent Activity of the Voltage-Gated Proton Channel.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2024

Same author

Sugar binding of sodium-glucose cotransporters analyzed by voltage-clamp fluorometry.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2024

Same author

ATP modulates the activity of the voltage-gated proton channel through direct binding interaction.

The Journal of physiology·2023

Same author

Intermolecular functional coupling between phosphoinositides and the potassium channel KcsA.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2022

Same author

Rhodopsin-bestrophin fusion proteins from unicellular algae form gigantic pentameric ion channels.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2022

Same author

Cryo-EM structures of thylakoid-located voltage-dependent chloride channel VCCN1.

Nature communications·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Quantum error correction via less noisy qubits.

Yuichiro Fujiwara¹

¹Division of Physics, Mathematics, and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, MC 253-37, Pasadena, California 91125, USA. yuichiro.fujiwara@caltech.edu

Physical Review Letters

|May 18, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new quantum error correction method using auxiliary qubits that can tolerate some errors. This advances quantum computing by enabling broader use of classical error-correcting codes.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Quantum Information Science
Quantum Computing
Error Correction

Background:

Classical error correction schemes are limited in their application to quantum error correction.
Entanglement-assisted quantum error correction (EAQEC) broadens code applicability but requires noiseless auxiliary qubits.
Noiseless auxiliary qubits represent a significant practical challenge in quantum systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a more realistic quantum error correction scheme.
To relax the stringent requirement of noiseless auxiliary qubits in EAQEC.
To enable the use of any classical linear codes in quantum error correction under relaxed assumptions.

Main Methods:

Proposed novel encoding and decoding operations for quantum error correction.
Utilized auxiliary qubits that can experience a specific type of quantum error.
Demonstrated the scheme's ability to import any binary or quaternary linear codes.

Main Results:

The new scheme functions effectively even when auxiliary qubits are not perfectly noiseless.
The proposed method generalizes EAQEC by allowing errors on auxiliary qubits.
When auxiliary qubits are noiseless, the scheme reduces to EAQEC and meets the quantum Singleton bound for MDS codes.

Conclusions:

The developed quantum error correction scheme is more practical and robust than existing EAQEC methods.
This work expands the applicability of classical linear codes to quantum error correction.
The findings pave the way for more resilient quantum computers by easing hardware requirements.