Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
Published on: November 4, 2010
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programme
M Stedenfeldt1, P Øian, M Gissler
1The Norwegian Continence and Pelvic Floor Centre, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Women's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
An intervention reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) by 59% was effective, particularly in low-risk births. Key risk factors for OASIS remained consistent post-intervention, highlighting the intervention's targeted success.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine
- Surgical Safety
Background:
- Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) represent a significant complication of vaginal delivery.
- A previous interventional program successfully reduced the overall OASIS rate from 4.6% to 2.0%.
- Understanding the risk profile associated with OASIS after such interventions is crucial for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the risk profile of sustaining OASIS in different risk groups post-intervention.
- To assess the impact of an intervention focused on manual assistance during the second stage of labor on OASIS rates.
- To identify changes in the association between known risk factors and OASIS following the intervention.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, interventional cohort study with a before-and-after comparison design.
- Data from 40,154 vaginal deliveries across four Norwegian obstetric departments between 2003 and 2009 were analyzed.
- Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for OASIS associated with various risk factors pre- and post-intervention.
Main Results:
- The overall risk of OASIS decreased by 59% (OR 0.41) following the intervention.
- The most significant reduction in OASIS (65%) was observed in the low-risk group (Group 0).
- Established risk factors for OASIS, such as first vaginal delivery, high birthweight, forceps delivery, and mediolateral episiotomy, showed largely unchanged associations post-intervention.
Conclusions:
- The interventional program significantly reduced OASIS rates, with the greatest impact seen in low-risk births.
- Despite the overall reduction, the primary risk factors associated with OASIS remained consistent.
- Manual assistance during the second stage of labor appears effective in mitigating OASIS, particularly in lower-risk populations.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...

