Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

11:28
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Human liver finite element model validation using compressive and tensile experimental data - biomed 2013
Matthew L Davis1, Daniel P Moreno, Nicholas A Vavalle
1Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University.
Summary
This study validated a computational liver model against biomechanical test data. The model accurately predicted tensile liver tissue response, crucial for improving finite element models in blunt abdominal trauma assessment.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Computational modeling
- Trauma research
Background:
- Motor vehicle crashes frequently cause blunt abdominal trauma, necessitating reliable injury assessment tools.
- Finite element models (FEM) are vital for injury assessment, but their accuracy relies on precise material models.
- A hyperelastic and viscoelastic liver material model was recently proposed by Samur et al.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a computational liver model's predictions with experimental biomechanical data.
- To evaluate the accuracy of a proposed hyperelastic and viscoelastic liver material model.
- To assess the model's suitability for finite element analysis in trauma research.
Main Methods:
- Liver tissue samples were simulated using the finite element method with four different mesh types (fine/coarse hexahedral/tetrahedral).
- Simulations subjected samples to uniaxial tension and compression at four strain rates (0.01 to 10 strain/sec).
- Model predictions were quantitatively compared against experimental data using the CORA software package.
Main Results:
- The computational model demonstrated higher accuracy in predicting the tensile response (CORA size error factor 0.66) compared to the compressive response (0.19).
- Fine tetrahedral, fine hexahedral, and coarse hexahedral meshes yielded similar predictive performance.
- The coarse tetrahedral mesh exhibited the poorest accuracy, with an 8.6% higher error factor than fine tetrahedral simulations.
Conclusions:
- The validated liver model shows promise for improving blunt abdominal trauma simulations in full-body FEM.
- The model captures viscoelastic behavior, though it currently under-predicts the experimentally observed loading rates.
- Further refinement of material models is recommended to enhance predictive accuracy for compressive loading conditions.
