Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bone Structure01:55

Bone Structure

Within the skeletal system, the structure of a bone, or osseous tissue, can be exemplified in a long bone, like the femur, where there are two types of osseous tissue: cortical and cancellous.
Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What outcomes can be expected after surgical treatment of primary pelvic bone sarcomas in children at referral centers?

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2026
Same author

A modified Delphi consensus on tenosynovial giant cell tumour and giant cell tumour of bone : a report from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM).

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Complications of PI to PIII hemipelvic resections for intermediate and malignant tumours : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Unplanned resections in extremity soft tissue sarcomas: higher local recurrence, more complications and less chance of limb preservation.

International orthopaedics·2025
Same author

Intraoperative Pain During Carpal Tunnel Release Performed by Experienced Surgeons: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing WALANT with Local Anesthesia and Tourniquet.

The Journal of hand surgery·2025
Same author

[Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors in surgically treated patients with synovial sarcoma].

Medicina·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
08:15

Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy

Published on: February 17, 2023

Three-dimensional virtual bone bank system workflow for structural bone allograft selection: a technical report.

Lucas Eduardo Ritacco1, German Luis Farfalli, Federico Edgardo Milano

  • 1Virtual Planning and Navigation Unit, Department of Health Informatics, Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, 1199 Buenos Aires, Argentina ; Institute of Orthopedics "Carlos E. Ottolenghi", Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, Potosí 4247, 1199 Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Sarcoma
|May 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study describes a new workflow for selecting structural bone allografts using a virtual bone bank system. Traditional methods relied on 2D X-rays, which limited the ability to match donor grafts with host anatomy. The new approach uses 3D CT scans to create virtual models of bones. Surgeons can then compare these models in a digital environment to find the best match. The system allows for precise measurements and virtual placement of grafts before surgery. The study suggests that this method improves graft selection and surgical planning. By using 3D imaging, surgeons gain more accurate information to guide their decisions. The workflow may help reduce intraoperative complications and improve surgical outcomes.

Keywords:
3D bone modelingallograft selectionpreoperative planningvirtual surgical tools

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015

Biomechanical Testing of Murine Tendons
10:09

Biomechanical Testing of Murine Tendons

Published on: October 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
08:15

Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy

Published on: February 17, 2023

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015

Biomechanical Testing of Murine Tendons
10:09

Biomechanical Testing of Murine Tendons

Published on: October 15, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery techniques
  • Medical imaging applications
  • Biological tissue engineering

Background:

Bone allografts have been used for reconstructing bone defects for decades, with mixed outcomes due to limited selection methods. Traditional approaches relied on two-dimensional X-ray imaging, which offered limited spatial accuracy. Surgeons faced challenges in matching donor grafts to host anatomy, leading to suboptimal surgical outcomes. Prior research has shown that 2D imaging fails to capture complex anatomical relationships. This gap motivated the development of more advanced preoperative planning tools. No prior work had resolved how to optimize graft selection using three-dimensional data. Recent advances in medical imaging have enabled new workflows for preoperative planning. The need for improved graft matching has driven innovation in virtual surgical planning.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to describe a new workflow for selecting structural bone allografts using a virtual bone bank system. The goal was to improve graft-host compatibility by leveraging three-dimensional imaging. The authors sought to outline a step-by-step process for surgeons to follow. They wanted to demonstrate how virtual tools can enhance preoperative decision-making. The study focused on optimizing graft selection based on anatomical matching. The researchers proposed that 3D modeling could reduce intraoperative surprises. They aimed to provide a reproducible method for virtual graft evaluation. This approach was designed to support better surgical outcomes through improved planning.

Main Methods:

The study utilized three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans to generate virtual bone models. These models were imported into a preoperative planning platform for analysis. Researchers compared the host anatomy with available allografts in a digital environment. They measured key anatomical dimensions to assess compatibility. The workflow included virtual placement of grafts to simulate surgical outcomes. Surgeons used the system to evaluate graft options before surgery. The study emphasized the importance of preoperative data integration. The method involved iterative refinement of graft selection criteria.

Main Results:

The virtual bone bank system enabled accurate size and shape comparisons between host and donor bones. Surgeons reported increased confidence in graft selection after using the 3D platform. The study found that virtual planning reduced intraoperative adjustments. The system provided detailed anatomical information previously unavailable. Virtual models allowed for precise graft placement simulations. The workflow improved the efficiency of graft selection processes. The study demonstrated that 3D modeling enhanced surgical preparedness. The results suggest that virtual tools can improve graft-host matching accuracy.

Conclusions:

The authors proposed that virtual bone bank systems offer a valuable tool for graft selection. They emphasized that 3D imaging improves anatomical matching in bone allograft surgery. The study suggests that preoperative planning platforms enhance surgical outcomes. The workflow described may help reduce intraoperative complications. The researchers proposed that virtual tools provide surgeons with more accurate data. They concluded that the system supports better decision-making before surgery. The study highlights the potential of 3D modeling in orthopedic planning. The findings suggest that virtual systems can improve graft-host compatibility.

The system uses 3D CT scans to compare host and donor anatomy, allowing precise graft matching before surgery.

Preoperative planning platforms enable surgeons to evaluate graft options and simulate placement in a virtual environment.

3D imaging provides detailed anatomical data that 2D X-rays cannot capture, improving graft-host compatibility.

Simulations allow surgeons to assess graft fit and reduce unexpected intraoperative adjustments.

The system provides detailed anatomical comparisons and graft placement options to guide preoperative choices.

The authors propose that these systems enhance graft selection accuracy and improve surgical outcomes.