Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Nerve conduction studies: orthodromic vs antidromic latencies.

T G Cohn1, J J Wertsch, D V Pasupuleti

  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
|July 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Entrapment Neuropathies about the Elbow.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Biomechanics of the double rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics.

Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference·2007
Same author

Biomechanical implications of the negative heel rocker sole shoe: gait kinematics and kinetics.

Gait & posture·2005
Same author

Postural orthostatic tachycardia warrants investigation of Chiari I malformation as a possible cause.

Cardiology·2004
Same author

Digit distribution of proper digital nerve action potential.

Muscle & nerve·2001
Same author

Acute hypothalamic instability in traumatic brain injury: a case report.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation·2001

Orthodromic versus antidromic stimulation does not affect sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) latency. This study found no significant differences when interelectrode distance was controlled, clarifying a debate in nerve conduction studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) measurements are influenced by various factors, including stimulation method and electrode placement.
  • A persistent debate exists regarding whether orthodromic or antidromic stimulation impacts SNAP latency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of orthodromic versus antidromic stimulation on SNAP latency.
  • To resolve the controversy by employing a controlled methodology.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-five healthy hands were analyzed using standardized electrophysiological techniques.
  • Median and ulnar digital nerves were stimulated both orthodromically and antidromically.
  • Interelectrode distance was precisely controlled (3 cm and 4 cm) for both stimulation and recording.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were observed in onset latency, peak latency, terminal latency, or amplitude between orthodromic and antidromic stimulation.
  • This finding held true across the tested interelectrode distances.

Conclusions:

  • Controlled interelectrode distance eliminates differences in SNAP latency attributed to stimulation direction (orthodromic vs. antidromic).
  • This clarifies that stimulation direction is not a confounding variable in SNAP latency measurements when methodology is standardized.