Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Watch out for "red flags" on a job interview.

L Tyler

    Hospitals
    |July 20, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Job seekers can avoid career disappointment by recognizing "red flags" during interviews. Identifying these warning signs early can prevent candidates from accepting unsuitable positions and experiencing future job dissatisfaction.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Healthy minds from 0-100 years: Optimising the use of European brain imaging cohorts ("Lifebrain").

    European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2017
    Same author

    Weaning children from mechanical ventilation: a prospective randomized trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning.

    Respiratory care·2001
    Same author

    CEO performance appraisal: review and recommendations.

    Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives·2001
    Same author

    Psychopathy and conduct problems in children: II. Implications for subtyping children with conduct problems.

    Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·1997
    Same author

    Bringing reality to the job hunt process. Interview by Barbara J. Linney.

    Physician executive·1995
    Same author

    When internal candidates want to be CEO: guidelines for the board.

    Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·1991

    Area of Science:

    • Organizational Psychology
    • Human Resources Management
    • Career Development

    Background:

    • Job candidates often prioritize self-promotion over critical evaluation during interviews.
    • Many candidates accept positions despite overlooking clear warning signs, leading to dissatisfaction.
    • The phenomenon of ignoring red flags contributes to poor hiring decisions and subsequent job failure.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the importance of identifying "red flags" during the job interview process.
    • To guide job candidates in recognizing potential issues with a position or organization.
    • To reduce the incidence of candidates accepting unsuitable jobs by improving their awareness of warning signs.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of common interview scenarios and candidate behaviors.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification and categorization of typical "red flags" in job postings and interviews.
  • Review of anecdotal evidence and psychological principles related to decision-making under pressure.

    • Main Results:

    • Candidates often exhibit naivete, focusing on "selling themselves" rather than assessing the job's suitability.
    • "Red flags" such as vague responsibilities, high turnover, or poor communication are frequently present but ignored.
    • Ignoring these warning signs leads to a higher likelihood of job dissatisfaction and regret.

    Conclusions:

    • Proactive identification of "red flags" is crucial for informed career decisions.
    • Candidates should balance self-promotion with critical assessment of the employer and role.
    • Awareness of warning signs empowers candidates to avoid "unpleasant surprises" and make better career choices.