Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sorcin couples Annexin A11 recruitment and ESCRT-III assembly during plasma membrane repair.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

p62 sorts Lupus La and selected microRNAs into breast cancer-derived exosomes.

The Journal of cell biology·2025
Same author

Endosome transcriptomics reveal trafficking of Cajal bodies into multivesicular bodies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Examining Honeybee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) Dominance Patterns Within Urban Bee Communities Worldwide.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Endosome transcriptomics reveal trafficking of Cajal bodies into multivesicular bodies.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Calpains orchestrate secretion of annexin-containing microvesicles during membrane repair.

The Journal of cell biology·2025
Same journal

The exquisite mechanics of a tsetse bite.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Distinct involvements of the subthalamic nucleus subpopulations in reward-biased decision-making in monkeys.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Pink1-mediated mitophagy in the endothelium releases proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA and activates neutrophil responses during inflammation.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Restraint of melanoma progression by cells in the local skin environment.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Brawn before bite in endemic Asian eutherian mammals after the end-Cretaceous extinction.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Experimental evolution to thermal stress indicates climate resilience in a cosmopolitan arthropod.

eLife·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Reforming research assessment.

Randy Schekman, Mark Patterson

    Elife
    |May 24, 2013
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The research community should move beyond the journal impact factor for evaluating scientific research. Adopting diverse, meaningful assessment methods is crucial for accurate research evaluation.

    Keywords:
    eLifepublishingresearch assessmentscience policyscientific publishing

    More Related Videos

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 11, 2026

    Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
    10:07

    Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

    Published on: June 21, 2010

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    Area of Science:

    • Bibliometrics
    • Research Assessment
    • Scientific Communication

    Background:

    • The journal impact factor (JIF) is a widely used but criticized metric for evaluating scientific research quality.
    • Limitations of JIF include its susceptibility to manipulation and its failure to capture the full scope of research impact.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for a paradigm shift in scientific research evaluation.
    • To propose the adoption of a broader range of meaningful assessment approaches beyond the JIF.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of current research evaluation practices.
    • Review of the principles outlined in the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA).

    Main Results:

    • The JIF is an inadequate sole measure of research output.
    • A consensus is emerging for more comprehensive evaluation methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Rethinking research assessment is imperative for the scientific community.
    • Implementing diverse evaluation metrics will lead to a more equitable and accurate appraisal of scientific contributions.