Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

A Mouse Model of Incompletely Resected Soft Tissue Sarcoma for Testing (Neo)adjuvant Therapies
Published on: July 28, 2020
Activity endpoints reported in soft tissue sarcoma phase II trials: quality of reported endpoints and correlation
Nicolas Penel1, Sophie Cousin, Alain Duhamel
1General Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Unit Research (EA 2694), Medical School, Lille-Nord-de-France University, Lille, France.
Background:
Despite extensive research over the past 3 decades, few investigational drugs are considered as promising and these drugs failed to improve overall survival. Therefore we performed a systematic review of the literature to improve our understanding of the reasons that explain these failures.
Methods:
We reviewed 53 phase II trial reports that investigated new treatments in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma from 1999 to 2011. We critically reviewed the selected primary endpoint used in these trials.
Results:
Forty percent of trials were not interpretable because of major inherent methodological flaws. Only 3 primary endpoints were correlated with median overall survival (mOS): 3- and 6-month progression free rates and median progression-free survival. Nevertheless, the mOS was not significantly higher in the cases of active drugs.
Discussion:
We need to improve the definition of primary active endpoints and develop better designs for future trials. The current definition of promising drugs must be refined.
Insights
Investigational drugs for advanced soft tissue sarcoma often fail to improve survival due to flawed trial designs and unclear endpoints. Refining these elements is crucial for future drug development success.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Drug Development
Background:
- Extensive research over 3 decades has yielded few promising investigational drugs for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
- Many investigational drugs have failed to demonstrate significant improvements in overall survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review literature and understand reasons for trial failures in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
- To critically evaluate primary endpoints used in phase II trials.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 53 phase II trial reports for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (1999-2011).
- Critical analysis of selected primary endpoints in these trials.
Main Results:
- 40% of trials were uninterpretable due to methodological flaws.
- Only progression-free survival metrics (3- and 6-month rates, median PFS) correlated with overall survival.
- Median overall survival was not significantly higher for active drugs.
Conclusions:
- Improvement needed in defining primary active endpoints for clinical trials.
- Development of better trial designs is essential for future research.
- The definition of "promising drugs" requires refinement.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...