Evaluation of hemostatic field dressing for bacteria, mycobacteria, or fungus contamination

Clinton K Murray1, Tyson Brunstetter, Miriam Beckius

  • 1San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.

Military Medicine
|May 28, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Hemostatic field dressings, crucial for wounded warriors, were tested for contamination. This pilot study found no evidence of bacterial, fungal, or mycobacterial contamination in these essential medical supplies.

Area of Science:

  • Military Medicine
  • Infectious Disease Control
  • Wound Management

Background:

  • Infectious complications pose significant risks to wounded military personnel.
  • Multidrug-resistant bacteria, fungi, and mycobacteria are common pathogens.
  • Potential pathogen sources include healthcare settings, the environment, and patient flora.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate hemostatic field dressings as a potential source of wound pathogen inoculation.
  • To assess bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial contamination in hemostatic dressings.

Main Methods:

  • Two hemostatic dressings (QuikClot Combat Gauze, CELOX Gauze) were tested post-storage.
  • Sixteen QuikClot Combat Gauze samples from deployed personnel were analyzed.
  • Cultures were performed using various media to detect microbial growth.

Main Results:

  • No bacteria, fungi, or mycobacteria were isolated from any tested hemostatic dressing samples.
  • Contamination was not detected even in dressings subjected to field conditions and mechanical stress.

Conclusions:

  • Hemostatic field dressings do not appear to be a source of microbial contamination for wounds.
  • Further research is required to identify the sources of fungal and mycobacterial infections in wounded warriors.