Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects01:29

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring01:24

Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors01:24

Cattell's 16 Personality Factors

Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the fundamental,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

By the First Session: Initial Evidence Regarding the Early Therapeutic Environment.

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·2026
Same author

Can a 1-Item Scale for Psychotherapy Outcomes Be Psychometrically Robust?

Clinical psychology in Europe·2025
Same author

Short-term diet intervention comprising of olive oil, vitamin D, and omega-3 fatty acids alters the small non-coding RNA (sncRNA) landscape of human sperm.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Other Biologics in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Updated Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Dermatology and therapy·2024
Same author

Longitudinal Follow-Up Study of Social Intervention Outcomes for Children on the Autism Spectrum.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2024
Same author

Feasibility and acceptability of a brief intervention to improve mild traumatic brain injury recovery: Problem-solving training-concussion.

Rehabilitation psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
09:55

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder

Published on: March 8, 2018

Dimensionality, reliability, and validity of the combat experiences scale.

Wendy M Guyker1, Kerry Donnelly, James P Donnelly

  • 1Department of Counseling, School, and Educational Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, 409 Baldy Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

Military Medicine
|May 28, 2013
PubMed
Summary

The Combat Experiences Scale (CES) effectively measures combat exposure in veterans, correlating with PTSD, depression, and anxiety. This validated tool aids in understanding deployment experiences for better postcombat care.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
09:55

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder

Published on: March 8, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Psychological assessment
  • Military psychology
  • Trauma studies

Background:

  • Limited research exists on measuring combat exposure during wartime deployments.
  • Accurate measurement is crucial for understanding combat experiences and informing postcombat treatment and recovery.
  • New combat forms and psychological sequelae necessitate refined assessment tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the internal and external validity of the Combat Experiences Scale (CES).
  • To provide psychometric data for the CES, a 33-item measure of deployment-related experiences.

Main Methods:

  • Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the scale's structure.
  • Data were collected from 500 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.
  • Internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Factor analysis identified three key factors: Exposure to Combat Environment, Physical Engagement, and Proximity to Serious Injury and Death.
  • The CES demonstrated adequate internal consistency.
  • Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity was found.

Conclusions:

  • The CES is a psychometrically sound measure for assessing combat exposure.
  • Deployment-related experiences measured by the CES are highly correlated with probable post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety.
  • Broad assessment of deployment experiences is vital for veteran mental health care.