Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Human Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Sampling Using a Mini-Liposuction Technique
Published on: September 27, 2021
Ultrasound estimates of visceral and subcutaneous-abdominal adipose tissues in infancy
Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe1, Neena Modi, Sabita Uthaya
1MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, P.O. Box 285, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. ed219@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
Insights
Ultrasound (US) effectively measures infant abdominal fat, correlating well with MRI. US can rank infants by internal-abdominal adiposity (IA-AT) and subcutaneous-abdominal adiposity (SCA-AT) levels.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric imaging
- Body composition analysis
- Infant growth studies
Background:
- Quantifying infant internal-abdominal adiposity (IA-AT) and subcutaneous-abdominal adiposity (SCA-AT) is challenging due to impractical imaging techniques.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a reference standard but not always feasible for infant adiposity assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate ultrasound (US) measurements of visceral and subcutaneous-abdominal depths against MRI for assessing IA-AT and SCA-AT in infants.
- To analyze the association between US-derived abdominal adiposity and anthropometric measures at 3 and 12 months of age.
Main Methods:
- Twenty-two infants underwent both MRI and US for abdominal adiposity quantification.
- The Cambridge Baby Growth Study (CBGS) assessed US abdominal parameters and anthropometrics in 487 infants at 3 months and 495 at 12 months.
- Correlation analyses were performed between US and MRI measures, and between US measures and anthropometric data.
Main Results:
- US visceral and subcutaneous-abdominal depths showed significant correlations with MRI-quantified IA-AT (r=0.48) and SCA-AT (r=0.71), respectively.
- Mean US-visceral depths increased by approximately 20% between 3 and 12 months, being lower in breastfed infants.
- US measures demonstrated the ability to rank infants by IA-AT and SCA-AT, with distinct associations with birth and current skinfold thickness.
Conclusions:
- Ultrasound is a validated, practical method for assessing infant IA-AT and SCA-AT, correlating well with MRI.
- US abdominal adiposity measures provide insights into infant body composition and its regulation.
- Differential associations suggest distinct regulatory mechanisms for visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat during infancy.
Abstract:
Other imaging techniques to quantify internal-abdominal adiposity (IA-AT) and subcutaneous-abdominal adiposity (SCA-AT) are frequently impractical in infants. The aim of this study was twofold: (a) to validate ultrasound (US) visceral and subcutaneous-abdominal depths in assessing IA-AT and SCA-AT from MRI as the reference method in infants and (b) to analyze the association between US abdominal adiposity and anthropometric measures at ages 3 months and 12 months. Twenty-two infants underwent MRI and US measures of abdominal adiposity. Abdominal US parameters and anthropometric variables were assessed in the Cambridge Baby Growth Study (CBGS), n = 487 infants (23 girls) at age 3 months and n = 495 infants (237 girls) at 12 months. US visceral and subcutaneous-abdominal depths correlated with MRI quantified IA-AT (r = 0.48, P < 0.05) and SCA-AT (r = 0.71, P < 0.001) volumes, respectively. In CBGS, mean US-visceral depths increased by ~20 % between ages 3 and 12 months (P < 0.0001) and at both ages were lower in infants breast-fed at 3 months than in other infants. US-visceral depths at both 3 and 12 months were inversely related to skinfold thickness at birth (P = 0.03 and P = 0.009 at 3 and 12 months, resp.; adjusted for current skinfold thickness). In contrast, US-subcutaneous-abdominal depth at 3 months was positively related to skinfold thickness at birth (P = 0.004). US measures can rank infants with higher or lower IA-AT and SCA-AT. Contrasting patterns of association with visceral and subcutaneous-abdominal adiposities indicate that they may be differentially regulated in infancy.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Hypodermis

