Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Saccadic reaction times in alternating cover.
Yuma Shinomiya1, Tetsuto Yamada, Kenji Suzuki
1International University of Health and Welfare, Department of Orthoptics and Visual Sciences, Otawara city 3248501, Japan. yuma@iuhw.ac.jp
Saccadic reaction times (SRTs) were longer in the alternating cover task compared to normal viewing for controls and patients with intermittent exotropia or esophoria. This suggests altered visual processing during binocular vision challenges.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Vision Science
Background:
- Saccadic reaction times (SRTs) are crucial for visual-motor function.
- Understanding SRTs in different viewing conditions is important for diagnosing and managing binocular vision disorders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare saccadic reaction times (SRTs) during an alternating cover task (AC-task) versus standard monocular viewing.
- To investigate potential differences in SRTs across control subjects and individuals with intermittent exotropia and esophoria.
Main Methods:
- Participants included 10 controls, 8 with esophoria, and 7 with intermittent exotropia.
- SRTs were measured using an infrared limbal-tracking system and electro-oculogram.
- The AC-task involved alternating eye coverage while a peripheral target appeared, contrasting with a normal fixation task.
Main Results:
- Average SRTs in the AC-task were 224.2 ms (controls), 198.2 ms (exophoria), and 227.3 ms (intermittent exotropia).
- Average SRTs in the normal-task were 200.7 ms (controls), 178.2 ms (exophoria), and 185.4 ms (intermittent exotropia).
- SRTs were generally prolonged in the AC-task across all subject groups compared to the normal-task.
Conclusions:
- The alternating cover task significantly prolonged saccadic reaction times compared to normal viewing conditions.
- These findings suggest that binocular vision challenges, such as those in the AC-task, impact visual processing speed.
- The results highlight potential differences in visual-motor responses in individuals with binocular vision anomalies.
More Related Videos
11:12Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
08:45A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014